Differential Geometry and Quantum Mechanics

Reedeegi
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
After finding and reading Geroch's notes on Quantum Mechanics formulated within Differential Geometry, I was wondering if there are other books that treat Quantum Mechanics in a similar fashion, focusing upon the geometrical aspects of Quantum Mechanics in order to formulate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Reedeegi said:
After finding and reading Geroch's notes on Quantum Mechanics formulated within Differential Geometry, I was wondering if there are other books that treat Quantum Mechanics in a similar fashion, focusing upon the geometrical aspects of Quantum Mechanics in order to formulate it.

Could you give the reference to Geroch's formulation of QM that you read?
 
AEM said:
Could you give the reference to Geroch's formulation of QM that you read?

Certainly, a copy can be found http://physics.syr.edu/~salgado/geroch.notes/geroch-gqm.pdf" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Did you read von Neumann's classic "The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics" ?
It is basically the starting point of non-commutative geometry.
I do not claim it's better than Geroch's book, which I have not read (!), but in von Neumann's style, nothing is left unproven. Basically, no prerequisite is necessary.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
956
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Sticky
2
Replies
70
Views
22K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top