Differential Geometry/Ricci Calculus Question

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mannyfold
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Differential
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties and definitions of differentials in the context of differential geometry and Ricci calculus. Participants are exploring the relationship between one-forms, tangent vectors, and the application of the differential operator, particularly focusing on the expression dx_i(partial_j) and its implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of the statement dx_i(partial_j) = kroenicker delta ij, expressing confusion over the transition from partial derivatives to this equality.
  • Another participant attempts to clarify the definition of the differential, suggesting that df(v) = vf, where v is a tangent vector, and relates this to linear algebra concepts.
  • A different participant challenges the assumption that dx^i(v) = v^i, arguing that this is part of what they are trying to prove, thus introducing a circular reasoning concern.
  • One participant introduces an alternative perspective, stating that dx^i(partial/partial x^j) = (partial x^i)/(partial x^j) = delta ij, but expresses uncertainty about the first equality.
  • Another participant reiterates the directional derivative interpretation and questions the commutation of the differential operator, emphasizing the need for clarity in the assumptions being made.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus, with multiple competing views and ongoing challenges regarding the definitions and assumptions involved in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions and relationships between differentials, one-forms, and tangent vectors, indicating that there may be missing assumptions or unresolved mathematical steps in their reasoning.

mannyfold
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I am having a problem that is glossed over in many textbooks but is driving me nuts.

Consider the following inner product or one-form with a vector argument:

dx_i(partial_j) = kroenicker delta ij

Here, dx_i is a one-form and partial_j (the partial wrt x_j) is a vector.

Some books say:

dx_i(partial_j) = partial x_i / partial x_j = kroenicker delta ij

The problem is that I can't see how this is true. (Well, I do know that partial x_i / partial x_j = kroenicker delta ij but I can't see the rest.) What am I missing here?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The crux is the definition of the differential:

df(v)=vf, where v is a tangent vector.
This is of the form L(x)=ax in linear algebra:
L is a linear function, x a vector, a the covector, defined by a_i=L(e_i).

Now let df be dx and v the coordinate-tangentvector d/dx (d=partials),
then

dx^i(d/dx_j)=dx^i/dx_j=delta ij.
 
Last edited:
AHA!

That is the problem!

I don't see how df(v) = vf. Where did you get that definition of the differential?

df = partial f / partial x^i dx^i (i = 0 .. n)

but the partials here are just the components of the 1-form.

I have the feeling that there is something very simple that I'm not seeing here.
 
Let's write df=(df/dx^i)dx^i (last d=partials)

What is df(v), where v is a vector?

df(v)=(df/dx^i)dx^i(v)


What is dx^i(v)?

It's simply v^i.

So you can write:

df(v)=(df/dx^i)v^i = v^i(df/dx^i).

But what is our v^i on a manifold?

It's d/dx^i!

So you can write it as df(v)=vf, where v=d/dx^i
 
Last edited:
Hi Javanse,

I appreciate your replies, but I am going to challenge what you wrote.

We are seeking to prove df(v) = vf.

You wrote:

df(v)=(df/dx^i)dx^i(v)
What is dx^i(v)?

It's simply v^i.


But this assumes what we are trying to prove:
dx^i(v) = v^jx^i =d/dx^j (x^i) = v^i delta ij

You wrote:

df(v)=(df/dx^i)v^i = v^i(df/dx^i).

How can you commutate the differential operator v^i?

Finally, from this last statement you get df(v) = vf, but if you read it carefully you don't dispose of the df/dx^i so it appears that your result is:

df(v) = (d/dx^j) (df/dx^i) = v (df/dx^i)
 
Another perspective on this is yet another equality I've found that was not expounded upon:

dx^i (partial/partial x^j) = (partial x^i)/(partial x^j) = delta ij

I get the last equality. I can't see the first.
 
Okay, last try :)

Let v=v^i d/dx^i

-> v(f)=v^i df/dx^i.

This is the directional derivative.

df(v)=(df/dx^i)v^i = v^i(df/dx^i).

How can you commutate the differential operator v^i?
I introduced the operator at the end.
You can also write the v^i from the beginning in front of the derivative.

But the result is the same as above: it is the directional derivative.

But this assumes what we are trying to prove:
dx^i(v) = v^jx^i =d/dx^j (x^i) = v^i delta ij
dxi(v)=v(xi)=vj delta ij=vi :)

Maybe someone else has another explanation.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
818
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K