Differentiating a function of x wrt time

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on differentiating the displacement function of a simply supported beam with respect to time using the chain rule. The displacement function, denoted as w, is defined in segments based on the beam's length L and specific intervals. The user successfully applies the chain rule to derive the first derivative of w with respect to time, resulting in expressions involving w1 and w2. The conversation also highlights the need for clarity in notation and definitions to avoid confusion in mathematical expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically differentiation and the chain rule.
  • Familiarity with displacement functions in structural mechanics.
  • Knowledge of simply supported beam theory and boundary conditions.
  • Ability to interpret mathematical notation and symbols used in engineering contexts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in multi-variable calculus.
  • Learn about the principles of beam theory and how to derive displacement functions.
  • Research the calculation of second derivatives in the context of dynamic systems.
  • Explore the integral formulation for potential energy in mechanical systems.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physics students, and researchers involved in structural analysis, particularly those working with beam mechanics and dynamic systems.

c0der
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I figured out the only redundancy to my problem is this:

I'll start off with a simple case, where w1,w2 are the displacements at intervals of one third along a beam.

w = 3w1/L.x (Note, x is in the numerator for all cases)

To differentiate this with respect to time, I use the chain rule as follows:

∂w/∂t = ∂w/∂x.∂x/∂t = 3w1/L.w1'

Now for the second function, which depends on two displacement terms w1,w2

w = (2 - 3/L.x)w1 + (-1 + 3/L.x)w2

∂w/∂t = ∂w/∂x.∂x/∂t = -3/L.w1.w1' + 3/L.w2.w2'

I'd imagine this wrong, any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
c0der said:
Hi,

I figured out the only redundancy to my problem is this:

I'll start off with a simple case, where w1,w2 are the displacements at intervals of one third along a beam.
One third of what? If it's 1/3 of a unit, then there's no need to give them names.
c0der said:
w = 3w1/L.x (Note, x is in the numerator for all cases)
This is extremely difficult to read, with '.' apparently being used to indicate multiplication. The asterisk character, *, is typically used for multiplication.

What does x represent? What does w represent?
c0der said:
To differentiate this with respect to time, I use the chain rule as follows:

∂w/∂t = ∂w/∂x.∂x/∂t = 3w1/L.w1'

Now for the second function, which depends on two displacement terms w1,w2

w = (2 - 3/L.x)w1 + (-1 + 3/L.x)w2

∂w/∂t = ∂w/∂x.∂x/∂t = -3/L.w1.w1' + 3/L.w2.w2'

I'd imagine this wrong, any hints?
 
Thanks for your reply.

w = (3w1/L)*x for 0<x<L/3
w = [ 2 - (3/L)*x ]*w1 + [ -1 + (3/L)*x ]*w2 for L/3<x<2L/3
w = 3*w2*[ 1 - x/L ] for 2L/3<x<L

w is a displacement function for a simply supported beam satisfying w=0 at x=0 and x=L, w=w1 at x=L/3 and w=w2 at x=2L/3

w is the displacement function of the beam (breaking up a beam of length L into L/3 sized intervals, such that it can displace vertically). x is the horizontal axis along the beam

Now I'm trying to find ∂^2w/∂t^2, hope this is clear, to solve the integral ∫m*(∂^2w/∂t^2)*wdx, to get the acceleration term for the total potential energy functional (not important at this stage)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K