Differentiation With L'Hopital's Rule

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of L'Hopital's Rule to solve indeterminate forms in calculus. For question 2a, the user correctly applied L'Hopital's Rule to resolve the 0/0 form, arriving at the answer ln6 - ln3. In question 2b, the user initially miscalculated the limit involving the form 0^0 but later corrected their approach, ultimately finding that the limit evaluates to 1 after a second application of L'Hopital's Rule.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of L'Hopital's Rule
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with indeterminate forms in calculus
  • Ability to compute derivatives of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced applications of L'Hopital's Rule in calculus
  • Learn about different types of indeterminate forms and their resolutions
  • Explore logarithmic differentiation techniques
  • Practice solving limits involving exponential functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on limit evaluation, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of L'Hopital's Rule and its applications in solving indeterminate forms.

ardentmed
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

Need some more help again. I'll keep it brief.

This thread is only for question 2ab. Please ignore question 1:
08b1167bae0c33982682_21.jpg


For 2a, I simply employed L'Hopital's Rule since 0/0 is indeterminate form. Thus, my final answer came out to be: ln6-ln3.

As for 2b, I computed an indeterminate form in the form of 0^0, which requires L'Hopital's Rule.

After taking the derivative of both the numerator and denominator respectively, I ultimately obtained 0.
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ardentmed said:
Hey guys,

Need some more help again. I'll keep it brief.

This thread is only for question 2ab. Please ignore question 1:For 2a, I simply employed L'Hopital's Rule since 0/0 is indeterminate form. Thus, my final answer came out to be: ln6-ln3.

As for 2b, I computed an indeterminate form in the form of 0^0, which requires L'Hopital's Rule.

After taking the derivative of both the numerator and denominator respectively, I ultimately obtained 0.
Thanks in advance.

Hi ardentmed, :)

The answer for 2a is correct. However you can simplify it a little bit using the rules of logarithms. Could you see how?

The answer for 2b is incorrect. Could you write down your attempt at solving it so that I can tell where you made the mistake. :)
 
Sudharaka said:
Hi ardentmed, :)

The answer for 2a is correct. However you can simplify it a little bit using the rules of logarithms. Could you see how?

The answer for 2b is incorrect. Could you write down your attempt at solving it so that I can tell where you made the mistake. :)

Sure, I carried down the x as I converted the function to its logarithmic form, giving me xlntan(2x), I then proceeded to move the x down into the denominator (so it becomes 1/x in the denominator).

Moreover, I applied L'Hopital's Rule and took the derivative (albeit I'm not too sure if the function actually gives 0/0, but it looks like it).

This gave me:

2sec^2(2x) / tan(2x) * (-x^2 / 1) = infinity.

So the answer would be e^infinity = +infinity.

I'm at a loss as to how I arrived at this answer, as I'm almost definite that it is incorrect. I'd appreciate some help.

Thanks in advance.
 
Have you tried to apply L'hopital's rule again? 2sec^2(2x) / tan(2x) * (-x^2 / 1) seems to be in that form.
 
Rido12 said:
Have you tried to apply L'hopital's rule again? 2sec^2(2x) / tan(2x) * (-x^2 / 1) seems to be in that form.

Oh, is it in indeterminate form? I computed it to be infinity, but it could potentially be 0/0, but I'm not too sure.
 
$$\ln\left({y}\right)= \lim_{{x}\to{0^+}} \frac{2(sec2x)^2(-x^2)}{tan2x} $$ is of the form 0/0.
 
Rido12 said:
$$\ln\left({y}\right)= \lim_{{x}\to{0^+}} \frac{2(sec2x)^2(-x^2)}{tan2x} $$ is of the form 0/0.

Alright, so I performed another round of L'Hopital's rule and computed lny=0 because:

lny= $\lim_{{x}\to{0+}} (-4x^2 * tan2x-x)/1 $

Ergo,

y= e^0

Thus, the limit is 1.

Am I on the right track? Thanks.
 
That is correct, the limit evaluates to 1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K