Improper integral and the application of L'hopitals Rule

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of L'Hôpital's Rule to evaluate the improper integral of the probability density function \( c \cdot e^{-c \cdot t} \). The user correctly identifies the need to multiply the function by the variable \( t \) and encounters an indeterminate form of infinity over infinity. By applying L'Hôpital's Rule to the limit of the expression \( -e^{-c \cdot x} \cdot x \), they derive that the limit approaches zero as \( x \) approaches infinity. The user seeks clarification on whether L'Hôpital's Rule can be applied to just a part of the expression, which is confirmed as valid.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of improper integrals and probability density functions
  • Familiarity with L'Hôpital's Rule and its application
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, particularly integration by parts
  • Basic calculus concepts, including limits and indeterminate forms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of L'Hôpital's Rule in various contexts
  • Explore advanced integration techniques, including integration by parts and substitution
  • Learn about probability density functions and their properties
  • Investigate the behavior of limits involving exponential functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and anyone interested in advanced integration techniques and probability theory will benefit from this discussion.

nick.martinez
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
in this problem I am trying to find the mean of the probability density function of c*e^(-c*t) and by doing so i am multiplying the function stated previously by the variable t, which i know is correct. after taking the anti derivative and evaluating using the limit. I get an indeterminate form of infinity over infinity and I then take the derivative of the numerator and denominator of the expression -e^(-c*t)*t which = t/(e^(c*t))= and get 1/(e^(c*x) which tends to zero when i take the limit as x->∞. I'll show my attempt below. i know the answer i got is right, but am unsure if my application of l'hospital's rule is appropriate.


∫ t*c^(-c*t)dt after integrating by parts i get: lim x->∞ -e^(-c*x)*x-(e^(-c*x))/c
0

then when i evaluate from 0 to ∞: [lim x->∞ -(x/(e^(c*x))-((e^(-c*x))/c)]-[(-e^(0)*0)-1/c]
for the indeterminate part of this integral i use lhopitals rule and take derivative of numerator and denominator of just that part of the equation. is this correct? Can apply lhopitals to just part of an expression and not the rest. thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If [itex]lim_{x\to a} f(x)= A[itex]and [itex]\lim_{x\to a} g(x)= B[/itex] both exist then [itex]\lim_{x\to a} f(x)+ g(x)[/tex] also exists and is equal to A+ B. In your example, the first limit is 0 so you can use whatever method you want to determine the second.[/itex][/itex][/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K