Differentiation woes with temperature/entropy relations.

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 3K views
EricVT
Messages
165
Reaction score
6
Alright, this is probably a really redundant question but for some reason it is giving me trouble. Let's say you are given the entropy of a black hole as:

[tex]S=\frac{8\pi^2GM^2k}{hc}[/tex] (thanks Stephen Hawking)

And you have the relation between temperature and entropy/energy

[tex]\frac{1}{T}= \frac{\partial S}{\partial U}[/tex] (U is energy, S is entropy)

Now if you want an expression for the temperature of a black hole in terms of it's mass and you are using U = Mc^2, then should you rewrite:

[tex]M^2 = \frac{U^2}{c^4}[/tex]

[tex]S = \frac{8\pi^2GkU^2}{hc^5}[/tex]

And then differentiate with respect to U to get:

[tex]\frac{1}{T} = \frac{16\pi^2GkU}{hc^5}[/tex]

[tex]T = \frac{hc^5}{16\pi^2GkU}[/tex]

First of all, as the ENERGY increases the TEMPERATURE decreases? Is this really possible here? I'm confused by this. Finishing the problem, though, and rewriting U = Mc^2 gives:

[tex]T = \frac{hc^3}{16\pi^2GkM}[/tex]

Does this seem correct? I tried working the problem a different way by writing c in terms of U as well at the start, and differentiating that expression and got a completely different answer...one that is always negative no less. So with that approach you get constantly negative temperatures...I'm very confused by what result I should be looking for.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EricVT said:
First of all, as the ENERGY increases the TEMPERATURE decreases?
(Heuristically speaking) Remember that as a black hole gains energy, it expands, which has a cooling effect. This apparently dominates other effects. This is why we expect large black holes to be very stable, whereas tiny black holes should evaporate away very quickly.