Difficult Understanding Magnitude and Phase Shift of Transfer Function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the magnitude and phase shift of a transfer function. The original poster struggles with transitioning from the transfer function to the equations for magnitude and phase shift, questioning the logic behind finding the magnitude of the complex denominator. Clarifications suggest that multiplying the numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate can aid in understanding both the magnitude and phase angle. Additionally, graphical representation of complex numbers is recommended for better comprehension. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of manipulating complex numbers to clarify these concepts.
wellmoisturizedfrog
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
I am unsure if my current understanding of transfer functions is correct.
Hello,

My textbook offers the following transfer function as an example.

1701556509480.png


It then goes on to explain that the following equations represent the magnitude and phase shift of the transfer function.

1701556549125.png


However, I am having some difficulty jumping from the first equation to these equations. From my understanding, in order to find the magnitude of the transfer function, the magnitude of the complex number in the denominator is found. I'm not sure if this logic is correct.

I am also unsure about how the equation for the phase shift of the transfer equation has a negative sign in front. I understand the other aspects of it, though.

I would appreciate any clarifications.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Plotting the complex numbers graphically may help you understand why the denomiator is that way.

Multiply numerator and denominator by complex conjugate of denominator should help understand the angle.
 
scottdave said:
Multiply numerator and denominator by complex conjugate of denominator should help understand the angle.
And the magnitude as well......this is the standard way to manipulate complex numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave and alan123hk
Ah I see, thank you for the insight! I appreciate the insight and resources.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top