Difficult Understanding Magnitude and Phase Shift of Transfer Function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the magnitude and phase shift of a transfer function. The original poster struggles with transitioning from the transfer function to the equations for magnitude and phase shift, questioning the logic behind finding the magnitude of the complex denominator. Clarifications suggest that multiplying the numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate can aid in understanding both the magnitude and phase angle. Additionally, graphical representation of complex numbers is recommended for better comprehension. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of manipulating complex numbers to clarify these concepts.
wellmoisturizedfrog
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
I am unsure if my current understanding of transfer functions is correct.
Hello,

My textbook offers the following transfer function as an example.

1701556509480.png


It then goes on to explain that the following equations represent the magnitude and phase shift of the transfer function.

1701556549125.png


However, I am having some difficulty jumping from the first equation to these equations. From my understanding, in order to find the magnitude of the transfer function, the magnitude of the complex number in the denominator is found. I'm not sure if this logic is correct.

I am also unsure about how the equation for the phase shift of the transfer equation has a negative sign in front. I understand the other aspects of it, though.

I would appreciate any clarifications.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Plotting the complex numbers graphically may help you understand why the denomiator is that way.

Multiply numerator and denominator by complex conjugate of denominator should help understand the angle.
 
scottdave said:
Multiply numerator and denominator by complex conjugate of denominator should help understand the angle.
And the magnitude as well......this is the standard way to manipulate complex numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave and alan123hk
Ah I see, thank you for the insight! I appreciate the insight and resources.
 
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top