Diffraction limit on resolution

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the minimum aperture of a camera lens required for a spy plane to achieve a specific resolution at high altitudes. The problem involves concepts from optics, specifically diffraction limits and the Rayleigh criterion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to calculate the minimum aperture using the Rayleigh criterion and exploring different methods to derive the angle theta. There are questions about the correctness of their calculations and the assumptions made regarding angle measurements.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations and alternative methods to arrive at the same result, while others express uncertainty about their own results. There is acknowledgment of potential confusion regarding angle units and the application of the small angle approximation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the implications of using radians versus degrees in their calculations, as well as the need for consistency in applying trigonometric functions. There is also mention of specific values for wavelength and resolution limits that are central to the problem.

mrbling
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Q:Spy planes fly at extremely high altitudes (25.3 km) to avoid interception. Their cameras are reportedly able to discern features as small as 5.20 cm. What must be the minimum aperture of the camera lens to afford this resolution? (Use lambda = 550 nm.)

I first found theta.. .052m/2 = .026m (since .026 above and below the center = .052m)
tan theta = .026m/25300m, and theta = 4.578x10^-5

Then plugging into the rayleigh criterion for resolution limit of theta = 1.22lamda/D, where D is the diameter of the objective lens (same as aperture of camera??)... I get
theta = 1.22lamda/D
4.578x10^-5 = 1.22(550x10^-9)/D
D= .0147m, which is incorrect..

anyone know where I went wrong?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get d = .326m using
sin \theta = 1.22\frac{\lambda}{d}
and letting \theta = arctan \left( \frac{.052}{25300}\right)
so:
d = \frac{1.22x5.5x10^{-7}}{sin({arctan \left( \frac{.052}{25300}\right)})} = .326m

Not sure though. Do you know what the answer is supposed to be?
 
Gnome,
Your answer was the correct one. I tried your process earlier, but I think I was confusing the theta since it was given in radians as opposed to doing sin theta for the degrees..

Thanks!
 
You can get the same answer using the \theta=sin\theta small angle approximation, but then you have to be consistent & do the arctan calculation in radians also.

So \theta = arctan \left(\frac{.026}{25300}\right) = 2.0553x10^{-6}

and d = \frac{1.22x5.5x10^{-7}}{\theta} = .326 m
 
Gnome's answer in slightly more legible LaTeX:

gnome said:
You can get the same answer using the \theta=\sin\theta small angle approximation, but then you have to be consistent & do the arctan calculation in radians also.

So

\theta = \arctan \left(\frac{.026}{25300}\right) = 2.0553\times 10^{-6}

and

d = \frac{1.22\times 5.5\times 10^{-7}}{\theta} = .326\,\mbox{m}
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
977
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K