MHB Digit word problems -linear equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter paulmdrdo1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a problem involving two consecutive positive odd integers where the difference of their squares equals 64. The first solution incorrectly calculates the value of x, yielding integers 19 and 21 instead of the correct pair. The second solution correctly identifies the integers as 15 and 17, with x equating to 15. The confusion arises from the miscalculation in the first method, where x should have been 7 instead of 9. Ultimately, the second method provides the accurate answer to the problem.
paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
can you please tell why my solutions here yield different answers

here's the problem,

Find two consecutive positive odd integers such that the difference of their squares is 64.

my first solution is

let $2x+1=$ smaller odd interger
$2x+3=$ larger odd integer

$(2x+3)^2-(2x+1)^2=64$

$x=9$

the numbers are 19 and 21.

my 2nd solution

let $x=$ smaller odd interger
$x+2=$ larger odd integer

$(x+2)^2-(x)^2=64$

$x=15$

the numbers are 15 and 17.

which solution method is correct?

thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
paulmdrdo said:
$(2x+3)^2-(2x+1)^2=64$

$x=9$
This should be $x=7$.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top