Digitizing 60 Years of Family Photos - Share the Memories!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photos
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the digitization of family photo slides spanning over sixty years, with one user sharing their experience of converting these memories into digital format for their parents. They plan to present the digitized photos in a digital frame, highlighting the surprise their parents will have upon seeing the vast number of images stored on a small SD card. The quality of the old slides is noted, with some images appearing as if they were taken recently, showcasing the durability of the slides over time. Participants express nostalgia for old photographs, appreciating their unique textures and the emotions they evoke. There is also a conversation about the technology used for digitization, with some opting for professional scanning services due to the labor-intensive nature of the process. The topic of photo enhancement is discussed, with users sharing tips on color correction and the importance of preserving the original quality of vintage images. Overall, the thread emphasizes the value of preserving family history through digitization while fostering a sense of nostalgia for the past.
  • #31
Depends on how much reading/writing of the drive you do... but if you only look at them 'every once in a while'... then you should be fine for a good 10-20 years... but you should replace the drive probably every 3-4 maybe 5 years just to be safe...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Ivan Seeking said:
Does anyone happen to know how long flash memory is supposed to be reliable? I assume the answer is "decades".

As I understand it solid state storage is immortal in the same way as the elves in lotr -- they never die of old age, but you can still kill them.
 
  • #33
junglebeast said:
As I understand it solid state storage is immortal in the same way as the elves in lotr -- they never die of old age, but you can still kill them.

No, flash memory retention is finite. Depends on the technology, and how often the cells are accessed, but for low duty like this, the "decades" number is probably accurate. If you refresh the data every 10 years or so, the lifetime should be quite long.
 
  • #34
berkeman said:
No, flash memory retention is finite. Depends on the technology, and how often the cells are accessed, but for low duty like this, the "decades" number is probably accurate. If you refresh the data every 10 years or so, the lifetime should be quite long.

Does reading count as refresh, or are these completely separate processes?

Or is it technology dependent?
 
  • #35
Borek said:
Does reading count as refresh, or are these completely separate processes?

Or is it technology dependent?

For flash devices that I'm familiar with, you need to do an actual write to refresh the trapped charge. Reading doesn't do anything with the trapped charge, other than to sense whether it is there or not.

So to refresh most flash memory cells, you would do an erase-write cycle.
 
  • #36


Ivan Seeking said:
Heh, not at that resolution!

Just out of curiosity, can anyone name that car - make and model?

Looks like a Studebaker Lark Station Wagon.
 
  • #37


S_Happens said:
Looks like a Studebaker Lark Station Wagon.

Bravo!
 
  • #38
I'm definitely not old enough to be the one who should have answered that...
 
  • #39
Hail Ye Old People! :biggrin:
 
  • #40


Astronuc said:
He looks like Clark Kent.

I'll have to tell him that. :smile:

IMG.jpg


Maternal grandfather of said Clark Kent lookalike with the Harry Potter glasses. (My great-grandfather.) This one is circa 1890 something. I scored in the picture collecting department because no one else was particularly interested in my grandmother's photo collection when she passed away.

Oh, and Ivan, congrats on accomplishing such a huge job. Lucky you for not having to scan them all yourself. That would have been an icky labourious job. And thank you for the idea of preserving those memories digitally. It hadn't occurred to me and a lot of my old photos are deteriorating.
 
Last edited:
  • #42


George Jones said:
http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/3019/familyxud.jpg

A (poor quality) picture (from left to right) of one of my sisters, one of my brothers, and me taken in the 60s from the side of the gravel road on which we lived. The picture was probably taken by my oldest brother using an old Brownie,

http://www.brownie-camera.com/.

Is it me or do pictures like these just make you cry? What I mean is the nostalgia and the youth that was there.

Do you guys miss it? I think I do.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #43
Cry? Not. Nostalgia? Sure thing.
 
  • #44
Nice enhancement, Ivan. What did you do?
 
  • #45


FireSky86 said:
Is it me or do pictures like these just make you cry? What I mean is the nostalgia and the youth that was there.

Do you guys miss it? I think I do.
The past was a different time and place. We didn't know much about the wider world and it's troubles - Ignorance is bliss.

But we grow, we learn.

Sometimes I miss the simplicity and more peace and quiet.


My reference is a place on the south coast of Australia looking out over Bass Strait and the Southern Ocean. The small town where I lived had a population of about 200-300 people. I could look north to farms and forest hills beyond the farms. The beaches were not very crowded. When storms passed, I could stand and watch tall waves breaking over the rocks and jetty.
 
  • #46
GeorginaS said:
Nice enhancement, Ivan. What did you do?

I tried a quick color correction and then adjusted the brightness, contrast, and midtones. I don't have anything special; just Microsoft picture manager. Since I've had a bit of practice lately I thought I'd see how well I could clean it up. You may be able to do better by playing with it for awhile.
 
  • #47
I think removing sepia tint is not a good idea - I suppose that's the way the picture looks.

They were all slightly brown 100 years ago :smile:
 
  • #48
Borek said:
They were all slightly brown 100 years ago :smile:

I guess it depends on the purpose. If you want the best pictures possible, clean them up. If you want the color for nastalgia purposes or to give it an old look, leave it be. In my case, I had color slides from 1979 that were turning brown. THAT was not acceptable. In this particular case, it is almost like giving the photographer better equipement. :biggrin: A picture that was never possible!

The point was to show how easily the photos can be enhanced with inexpensive software.
 
Last edited:
  • #50
My first impression was that those photos look like a movie set, Ivan. Very cool. Who went to Tijuana in the 50s and took those pictures?

And yes, Borek, you're right. Those are the colours of the original photograph. Although clean up can make certain improvements to the photos -- as Ivan demonstrated -- I'd keep the original quality of them because their colours and hues are part of the history of them.

I'm a huge fan of old photos, and I'm not sure why. I just like them.
 
  • #51
GeorginaS said:
My first impression was that those photos look like a movie set, Ivan. Very cool. Who went to Tijuana in the 50s and took those pictures?

I think my parents went with the my mother's folks and brothers. Dad took the photos.

I'm a huge fan of old photos

Same here.
 
  • #52
Here are a few that I thought worth a post. First, dad next to his '46 Lincoln [his right]

http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/8967/92274107.jpg

Granpa's Buick - I think it was a '57
http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/3328/125g.jpg

http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/4738/125m.jpg

And a couple that I thought were just good photos:
Granny goofing around with a neighbor [1950 something]
http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/4039/117vw.jpg

Don't know who or when, but somebody from the past hamming it up for the camera. Probably ~1960

http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/2294/121y14.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K