Dimension and Basis of a Relation in R5

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Logan Land
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Dimension
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the dimension and basis of a set of points in R5 that satisfy the relation x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 = 0. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and conceptual clarification regarding vector spaces and their dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that since the relation involves only four variables, the dimension of the space should be 5, as it is R5.
  • Others argue that the dimension of the subspace defined by the relation is actually 4, as it can be expressed in terms of free variables.
  • A participant suggests that a basis can be constructed by setting free variables to 1 while others are set to 0, leading to four specific basis vectors.
  • There is a clarification that the dimension of a finite-dimensional vector space is determined by the number of vectors in its basis, which in this case is four.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the relationship between the basis vectors and the original equation, questioning how the basis vectors satisfy the relation.
  • A later reply explains that each basis vector satisfies the relation individually, not collectively, addressing the confusion about the summation of the basis vectors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the dimension of the subspace is 4, but there is initial confusion regarding the distinction between the dimension of R5 and the dimension of the subspace defined by the relation. The discussion reflects a mix of understanding and uncertainty about the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the initial misunderstanding of the relationship between the dimension of R5 and the subspace, as well as the interpretation of how basis vectors relate to the original equation.

Logan Land
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Find dimension and basis of the set of all points in R5 whose coordinates satisfy the relation x1 +x2 +x3 +x4 =0.

shouldn't there be 5 vectors to satisfy the basis since they are asking about R5? but the relation only has x1, x2, x3, and x4.

or would my matrix just look like this

1 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 1 0

so x1=x2=x3=x4=0?dimension = 5 since its asking R5?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
LLand314 said:
Find dimension and basis of the set of all points in R5 whose coordinates satisfy the relation x1 +x2 +x3 +x4 =0.

shouldn't there be 5 vectors to satisfy the basis since they are asking about R5? but the relation only has x1, x2, x3, and x4.

or would my matrix just look like this

1 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 1 0

so x1=x2=x3=x4=0?dimension = 5 since its asking R5?

Hi LLand314,

Since $x_4 = -x_1 - x_2 - x_3$, we let $x_1$, $x_2$, $x_3$, and $x_5$ be our free variables. So your vector space, call it $W$, is four-dimensional. A basis can be found by setting a free variable equal to one and every other free variable equal to 0. Setting $x_1 = 1$ and all other free variables equal to $0$, we get $x_4 = -1$. So $(1, 0, 0, -1, 0)$ is a basis vector. Show that the procedures three other basis vectors: $(0, 1, 0, -1, 0)$, $(0, 0, 1, -1, 0)$, and $(0, 0, 0, 0, 1)$. So a basis for $W$ is

$$\{(1,0,0,-1,0), (0,1,0,-1,0), (0,0,1,-1,0), (0,0,0,0,1)\}$$
 
Last edited:
Euge said:
Hi LLand314,

Since $x_4 = -x_1 - x_2 - x_3$, we let $x_1$, $x_2$, $x_3$, and $x_5$ be our our free variables. So your vector space, call it $W$, is four-dimensional. A basis can be found by setting a free variable equal to one and every other free variable equal to 0. Setting $x_1 = 1$ and all other free variables equal to $0$, we get $x_4 = -1$. So $(1, 0, 0, -1, 0)$ is a basis vector. Show that the procedures three other basis vectors: $(0, 1, 0, -1, 0)$, $(0, 0, 1, -1, 0)$, and $(0, 0, 0, 0, 1)$. So a basis for $W$ is

$$\{(1,0,0,-1,0), (0,1,0,-1,0), (0,0,1,-1,0), (0,0,0,0,1)\}$$

so is my dimension 4 or 5? my book says dim(R^n)=n so that would be 5 correct? but then you stated four-dimensional
 
LLand314 said:
so is my dimension 4 or 5? my book says dim(R^n)=n so that would be 5 correct? but then you stated four-dimensional

You're not computing the dimension of $\Bbb R^5$, but the dimension of a subspace of $\Bbb R^5$, which need not be $5$-dimensional. Recall that the dimension of a finite-dimensional vector space $V$ is equal to the number of elements in a basis for $V$. Since $W$ has a basis consisting of four vectors (the list is already displayed), $\text{dim}\, W = 4$.
 
Euge said:
You're not computing the dimension of $\Bbb R^5$, but the dimension of a subspace of $\Bbb R^5$, which need not be $5$-dimensional. Recall that the dimension of a finite-dimensional vector space $V$ is equal to the number of elements in a basis for $V$. Since $W$ has a basis consisting of four vectors (the list is already displayed), $\text{dim}\, W = 4$.

I see, that makes much more sense, the R^n isn't the same as $\Bbb R^5$

Still a little confused on when you found the basis
{(1,0,0,−1,0),(0,1,0,−1,0),(0,0,1,−1,0),(0,0,0,0,1)}
how does that equal 0 when x1+x2+x3+x4
 
LLand314 said:
I see, that makes much more sense, the R^n isn't the same as $\Bbb R^5$

Still a little confused on when you found the basis
{(1,0,0,−1,0),(0,1,0,−1,0),(0,0,1,−1,0),(0,0,0,0,1)}
how does that equal 0 when x1+x2+x3+x4

Sorry, but the question does not make sense to me. Each basis vector lies in $W$. For example, $(1,0,0,-1,0)$ lies in $W$ since $1 + 0 + 0 - 1 = 0$.
 
Euge said:
Sorry, but the question does not make sense to me. Each basis vector lies in $W$. For example, $(1,0,0,-1,0)$ lies in $W$ since $1 + 0 + 0 - 1 = 0$.

OOOOOOOO I see now, I was thinking that {(1,0,0,−1,0),(0,1,0,−1,0),(0,0,1,−1,0),(0,0,0,0,1)} all together needed to equal 0
I see now what you mean. That was actually an easy question I just was thinking of it completely wrong and making it difficult. thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
20K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K