Dimension of a vector space and its subspaces

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of vector subspaces and their dimensions in relation to the vector spaces they belong to. Participants explore whether a vector subspace can have the same dimension as the space it is part of, the implications of such a scenario, and the existence of Cartesian equations for these subspaces. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and examples, particularly focusing on finite and infinite dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that a vector space is a subspace of itself, referred to as a trivial subspace, and question whether such a subspace can have a Cartesian equation.
  • It is noted that if the dimension is finite, then a subspace having the same dimension as the space implies equality of the two spaces.
  • Others argue that in the case of infinite dimensions, the situation is more complex, with examples provided such as the relationship between the rational numbers and their extensions.
  • Some participants discuss specific examples of subspaces with the same dimension, including the rational numbers and their extensions, while others challenge the clarity of these examples.
  • There are corrections and refinements regarding the dimensions of specific subspaces and the nature of their relationships, particularly concerning the cardinality of bases.
  • Participants express confusion about the dimensions being described as countably infinite and seek clarification on the definitions and examples provided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a vector space can be a subspace of itself, but there is disagreement regarding the implications of dimensions in finite versus infinite cases. The discussion remains unresolved regarding specific examples and the clarity of dimensions in various contexts.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on specific definitions of dimensions and cardinalities, which may not be universally accepted. The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of vector spaces and their subspaces that are not fully explored.

Txema
Messages
24
Reaction score
5
TL;DR
Can a vector subspace have the same dimension as the space it is part of?
Can a vector subspace have the same dimension as the space it is part of?
If so, can such a subspace have a Cartesian equation?
if so, can you give an example.

Thanks in advance;
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Txema said:
TL;DR Summary: Can a vector subspace have the same dimension as the space it is part of?

Can a vector subspace have the same dimension as the space it is part of?
If so, can such a subspace have a Cartesian equation?
if so, can you give an example.

Thanks in advance;
Is this homework?

Technically, a vector space is a subspace of itself. This is sometimes called a trivial subspace or not a proper subspace. See, for example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_subspace
 
Txema said:
TL;DR Summary: Can a vector subspace have the same dimension as the space it is part of?

Can a vector subspace have the same dimension as the space it is part of?
If so, can such a subspace have a Cartesian equation?
if so, can you give an example.

Thanks in advance;
If the dimension is finite, then inclusion ##U\subseteq V## AND equal (finite) dimension implies equality ##U=V.## Both properties are required for this conclusion.

If the dimension is infinite, then things are more complicated. For example ##\mathbb{Q}\subseteq \mathbb{R}## has "the same dimension over ##\mathbb{Q}##" as ##\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})\subseteq \mathbb{R}## and ##\mathbb{Q}\subsetneq \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})## but they are obviously not equal. Infinite cardinalities behave different than ordinary numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mathwonk and PeroK
Txema said:
TL;DR Summary: Can a vector subspace have the same dimension as the space it is part of?

Can a vector subspace have the same dimension as the space it is part of?
If so, can such a subspace have a Cartesian equation?
if so, can you give an example.

Thanks in advance;
The dimension of a vector space is the number of vectors in its basis.
Each basis of a vector space has the same number of vectors and ##dim(Ssub) \leq dim(S)##.
PeroK said:
Technically, a vector space is a subspace of itself. This is sometimes called a trivial subspace or not a proper subspace. See, for example:
The Cartesian equation (If it is a scalar product that determines the subspace) is also trivial.
The scalar product with zero vector
##\langle 0,x \rangle=0 \cdot x_1+0 \cdot x_2+...+0 \cdot x_n=0##

That is it in finite dimensional spaces .

When the vector space has infinite dimensions, you can use the property that ##\infty+1## is still ##\infty##.

You can choose the set of all infinite sequences as a vector space ##x=(x_1, x_2, x_3, ... ) \in S##
and all sequences which sum is zero as a subspace ##Ssub## . Its dimension is ##\infty##.

The Cartesian equation in that situation is
##\langle 1,x \rangle=1 \cdot x_1+1 \cdot x_2+...+1 \cdot x_n +...=0##
where 1 is infinite series ##(1, 1, 1, ... )##

All constant sequences ( which all members are the same number ) is a subspace . Its dimension is 1.
e.g. ##(1, 1, 1, ...)##, ##(-4, -4, -4, ... ) ##, ...

A proper, non-trivial, subspace with the same dimension as the space can only be obtained if the vector space is infinite-dimensional.
 
Last edited:
PeroK said:
Is this homework?
No, I wish, I'm 60 years old.:smile:
Thank you Perok for your answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bosko
fresh_42, Bosko, my question is perfectly answered, thank you very much.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bosko
fresh_42 said:
If the dimension is infinite, then things are more complicated. For example ##\mathbb{Q}\subseteq \mathbb{R}## has "the same dimension over ##\mathbb{Q}##" as ##\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})\subseteq \mathbb{R}## and ##\mathbb{Q}\subsetneq \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})## but they are obviously not equal. Infinite cardinalities behave different than ordinary numbers.
This doesn't fit in the question, does it? What are the space and the subspace with the same dimensions?
 
martinbn said:
This doesn't fit in the question, does it? What are the space and the subspace with the same dimensions?
You are right, I should have written ...

The subspaces are ##\mathbb{Q}(\pi)## and ##\mathbb{Q}(\pi,\sqrt{2})## contained in the rational vector space ##\mathbb{R}.## The dimensions of both subspaces are then equal but the subspaces are not.
 
fresh_42 said:
It fits perfectly.

The subspaces are ##\mathbb{Q}## and ##\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})## contained in the rational vector space ##\mathbb{R}.## The dimensions of both subspaces are countably infinite, the dimension of ##\mathbb{R}## is uncountable infinite.
I don't understand. What do you mean the dimensions are countably infinite? The dimensions of ##\mathbb{Q}## and ##\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})## over the field ##\mathbb{Q}## are ##1## and ##2##.

But the question ask for a subspace of a space such that their dimensions are the same. So is it possible to have two spaces (over a field ##F##) say ##W\subset V## such that ##dim_FW=dim_FV##? What are the ##W## and ##V## in your example?
 
  • #10
martinbn said:
I don't understand. What do you mean the dimensions are countably infinite? The dimensions of ##\mathbb{Q}## and ##\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})## over the field ##\mathbb{Q}## are ##1## and ##2##.

But the question ask for a subspace of a space such that their dimensions are the same. So is it possible to have two spaces (over a field ##F##) say ##W\subset V## such that ##dim_FW=dim_FV##? What are the ##W## and ##V## in your example?
I corrected it.
 
  • #11
fresh_42 said:
I corrected it.
Still, what are the ##W## and ##V## in your example?
 
  • #12
martinbn said:
Still, what are the ##W## and ##V## in your example?
\begin{align*}
\mathrm{F}&=\mathbb{Q}\\
\mathrm{V}&=\mathbb{R}\\
\mathrm{W_1}&=\mathbb{Q}(\pi)\\
\mathrm{W_2}&=\mathbb{Q}(\pi,\sqrt{2})\\
\end{align*}
\begin{align*}
\dim_\mathrm{F} \mathrm{W_1}=\infty = \dim_\mathrm{F} \mathrm{W_2} \wedge \mathrm{W_1}\subsetneq \mathrm{W_2}
\end{align*}
 
  • #13
fresh_42 said:
\begin{align*}
\mathrm{F}&=\mathbb{Q}\\
\mathrm{V}&=\mathbb{R}\\
\mathrm{W_1}&=\mathbb{Q}(\pi)\\
\mathrm{W_2}&=\mathbb{Q}(\pi,\sqrt{2})\\
\end{align*}
\begin{align*}
\dim_\mathrm{F} \mathrm{W_1}=\infty = \dim_\mathrm{F} \mathrm{W_2} \wedge \mathrm{W_1}\subsetneq \mathrm{W_2}
\end{align*}
Then there is a missing ##\pi## in your first post. Why do you need to include ##\mathbb R##?
 
  • #14
martinbn said:
Then there is a missing ##\pi## in your first post. Why do you need to include ##\mathbb R##?
I was mistaken. My thought was that ##\mathbb{Q}\subseteq \mathbb{R}## was a vector space and a subspace with an uncountably infinite index. I then confused index and dimension instead of building a correct counterexample.
 
  • #15
fresh_42 said:
I was mistaken. My thought was that ##\mathbb{Q}\subseteq \mathbb{R}## was a vector space and a subspace with an uncountably infinite index. I then confused index and dimension instead of building a correct counterexample.
I know. I am not picking on you. I just thought it would be usfull to the OP if you clarify it. By the way the real numbers as a subspace of the complex numbers, both over the rationals may be an easier example for the OP.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
  • #16
since the dimension of a vector space is the cardinality of a basis, and every basis of a subspace extends to a basis of the containing space, and every set is the index set for a basis of a vector space, a simpler version of this question is whether a proper subset of a set can have the same cardinality.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K