MHB Dimension of $m \times n$ Matrices: Finding Basis

Guest2
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
What's the dimension of the space of $2 \times 2$ matrices? What's the dimension of the space of $m \times n$ matrices?

I know that matrices of size $m \times n$ with components in field $K$ form a vector space over $K$. To find the dimension, I would have to find basis. This I'm not quite sure how to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Guest said:
What's the dimension of the space of $2 \times 2$ matrices? What's the dimension of the space of $m \times n$ matrices?

I know that matrices of size $m \times n$ with components in field $K$ form a vector space over $K$. To find the dimension, I would have to find basis. This I'm not quite sure how to do.

Hi Guest,

The dimension of matrices in $\mathbb R^{2 \times 2}$ is written as $2 \times 2$, which is equal to $4$, since we need $4$ numbers to identify one.

A basis of the matrices of size $m \times n$ is the set of those matrices with a single $1 \in K$ in it and the rest $0 \in K$.
Any matrix can be written as a linear combination of those single-entry matrices.
 
I will answer the first question only:

A (possible) basis for the space of 2x2 matrices is:

$\left\{\begin{bmatrix}1&0\\0&0\end{bmatrix},\begin{bmatrix}0&1\\0&0\end{bmatrix},\begin{bmatrix}0&0\\1&0\end{bmatrix},\begin{bmatrix}0&0\\0&1\end{bmatrix}\right\}$

Clearly this spans, so it falls to you to show linear independence. Try generalizing this.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top