Dimensional analysis of the london penetration depth

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The London penetration depth, defined as \(\lambda_l = \sqrt{\frac{m^{**}}{4\pi n_{s} e^{2}}}\), is confirmed to be a length dimension. The dimensional analysis initially yields an incorrect result due to missing factors such as the speed of light \(c\) or the permeability of free space \(\mu_0\). To achieve the correct dimensionality, it is essential to incorporate these factors into the expression. Re-deriving the expression using Maxwell's equations with appropriate units is a recommended approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dimensional analysis in physics
  • Familiarity with the London penetration depth concept
  • Knowledge of Maxwell's equations
  • Basic grasp of SI units and their conversions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the London penetration depth in superconductivity
  • Learn about the role of the speed of light \(c\) in electromagnetic theory
  • Study the permeability of free space \(\mu_0\) and its significance in physics
  • Explore advanced dimensional analysis techniques in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students studying superconductivity, and anyone interested in advanced topics in electromagnetism and dimensional analysis.

phja
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
hi guys.

i have the london penetration depth defined as \lambda_l = \sqrt{\frac{m^{**}}{4\pi n_{s} e^{2}}}.

i'm trying to figure out the dimensionality of it...surely it must be a length, but i get

[(Kg)(m^{3})(A^{-1}s^{-1})]^{0.5}

in SI units.

am i doing something wrong?

cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are some units set to '1' in this expression, which is why your analysis comes out funky. You will need some factors of c or \mu_0 in your expression for the depth to make the dimension come out correct.

You could try to re-derive the expression for the depth yourself (just google it), and use the expression for the Maxwell equation with the proper units in place. It's doable!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K