B Dimensional Spin Inspection

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the relationship between the dimensions of spin and other physical quantities, such as action and angular momentum, suggesting a connection to electromagnetic dimensions. Specifically, it notes that in the MKS system, spin can be expressed in units of ohm·coulomb², independent of mechanical units. The role of the photon, which possesses spin and is an electromagnetic phenomenon, is questioned for its potential to unify disparate concepts in physics. Additionally, the conversation touches on the definitions of units in the SI system, linking them to fundamental constants like h and e. Overall, the exploration raises intriguing questions about the implications of these dimensional relationships in physics.
south
Messages
91
Reaction score
20
TL;DR Summary
We learn that the dimensions of spin coincide with the dimensions of other magnitudes, for example action and angular momentum. They also coincide with a purely electromagnetic jeep dimensional form.
We learn that the dimensions of spin coincide with the dimensions of other magnitudes, for example action and angular momentum. They also coincide with a purely electromagnetic dimensional form. Is the next.
$$\left[spin\right] = \left[ electric \ resistance \right] \ \left[electric \ charge \right]^2$$
In the MKS system, the spin admits the the following units. $$ohm \cdot coulomb^2$$ It is say, without reference to units linked to mechanics.

The photon is an electromagnetic phenomenon that has spin. Could that have any importance? Could it lead to a way of uniting concepts that we do not usually think about?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In SI system unit ohm is defined by h and e, and unit coulomb is defined by e. I am not sure that your electromagnetic dimensional form is meaningful. Photon has mometum and angular momentum. Spin anglurar momentum of photon is nothing new to me.
 
south said:
TL;DR Summary: We learn that the dimensions of spin coincide with the dimensions of other magnitudes, for example action and angular momentum. They also coincide with a purely electromagnetic jeep dimensional form.

In the MKS system, the spin admits the the following units. ohm⋅coulomb2 It is say, without reference to units linked to mechanics.
You should be able to do that with any mechanical units. This isn’t unique to spin
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top