Dimensionally correct equations

  • Thread starter dboy83
  • Start date
In summary: If you forget to carry units, the answer can be quite different than what you expect. Hope that helps!
  • #1
dboy83
34
0
]Okay, so this is my first physics class ever. I'm a little lost, but I believe I'm on the right track. Am I approaching this problem the right way?


-------------Dimension------------------------------Dimension-------
distance (x) (L) Acceleration (a) (L)/(T)^2

Time (t) (T) Force (F) (M)(L)/(T)^2

Mass (m) (M) Energy (E) (M)(L)^2/(T)^2

Speed (v) (L)/(T)


which of the following equations are dimensionally correct?

(A) F=ma (d) E=max
(b) x= at^3/2 (e) v= square root of (Fx/m)
(c) E= mv/2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You've quoted the correct dimensions for those quantities, which equations do you think are correct?
 
  • #3
Tomsk said:
You've quoted the correct dimensions for those quantities, which equations do you think are correct?


force= ma is the only one?
 
  • #4
dboy83 said:
]Okay, so this is my first physics class ever. I'm a little lost, but I believe I'm on the right track. Am I approaching this problem the right way?


-------------Dimension------------------------------Dimension-------
distance (x) (L) Acceleration (a) (L)/(T)^2

Time (t) (T) Force (F) (M)(L)/(T)^2

Mass (m) (M) Energy (E) (M)(L)^2/(T)^2

Speed (v) (L)/(T)


which of the following equations are dimensionally correct?

(A) F=ma (d) E=max
(b) x= at^3/2 (e) v= square root of (Fx/m)
(c) E= mv/2

if, F=ML/T^2 ( L/T^2) can be substituted for (a) thus giving you
f=ma
 
  • #5
F=ma is correct, but it's not the only one. For the others, multiply the dimensions of the quantities each equation uses together, not forgeting to use the correct powers each has, then compare the answer to the dimensions of the left hand side of the equation.
 
  • #6
I'm so lost. can you help walk me through B?
 
  • #7
OK, on the right we have a*t^3/2. The dimensions of this are [(L)/(T)^2]*[(T)^3/2], which, by cancelling (T)s reduces to (L)/(T)^1/2. On the left we have only (L), so this equation is not dimensionally correct.
 
  • #8
when you work with dimensions, use the fundamental units.

mass : kilogram: [kg]
length : meter : [m]
time : second :

so speed ; [m]/
acceleration : [m]/^2
force in Newtons [N] = [kg][m]/^2
work or energy is in joules [J] = [N][m] = [kg][m]^2 /^2

When you have a formula, it must be dimensionaly correct, so to verify if it is correct, you use the laws of exponents with the fundamental units. It is a simple algebra.
 
  • #9
Tomsk said:
OK, on the right we have a*t^3/2. The dimensions of this are [(L)/(T)^2]*[(T)^3/2], which, by cancelling (T)s reduces to (L)/(T)^1/2. On the left we have only (L), so this equation is not dimensionally correct.


Thanks! I think I see what you are doing now. The only part I found confusing is when you said you got (L)/(T)^1/2. You say the (T's) cancel out, but you have T^3 / T^2 so that would give you just T? so wouldn't the answer be LT/2 ?
 
  • #10
Just to add a comment for the OP. Carrying units through equations is one of the most fundamental tricks that I learned in college. Luckily I learned it on about the 3rd day of classes, in a first engineering class where we studied problems from all the different kinds of engineering (EE, ME, CE, ChE, etc.). We were working in groups on problems, and we were trying to solve a problem where we were having trouble remembering whether certain quantities belonged in the numerator or denominator. Most of us in our group were baffled at one point, with multiple possible forms of a formula. Then one member spoke up (I still remember this moment clearly, many years later), "Hey guys, this is easy. Just put the units next to each variable in the formula, and when you multiply and divide the variables, do the same to the units. The units in the end have to make sense for the answer."

We all looked at each other, and then had the correct form of the equation in something less than 10 seconds. To this day, when I have to remember relationships like between velocity, frequency and wavelength, I use units to remember the relationship, and don't bother memorizing it. Like this:

[tex]\lambda [m] = \frac{v [m/s]}{f [1/s]}[/tex]

What a great trick. I also use it in very complex calculations, to help me catch my math errors as I go along. Every term on one side of an addition equation has to have the same units, or you cannot add them. And the overall units of the lefthand side of the equation has to equal the units of the righthand side.
 
  • #11
BTW, as borisleprof shows, square brackets are usually used to show units. That helps to separate the units from the rest of the terms in the equation.
 
  • #12
berkeman said:
Just to add a comment for the OP. Carrying units through equations is one of the most fundamental tricks that I learned in college. Luckily I learned it on about the 3rd day of classes, in a first engineering class where we studied problems from all the different kinds of engineering (EE, ME, CE, ChE, etc.). We were working in groups on problems, and we were trying to solve a problem where we were having trouble remembering whether certain quantities belonged in the numerator or denominator. Most of us in our group were baffled at one point, with multiple possible forms of a formula. Then one member spoke up (I still remember this moment clearly, many years later), "Hey guys, this is easy. Just put the units next to each variable in the formula, and when you multiply and divide the variables, do the same to the units. The units in the end have to make sense for the answer."

We all looked at each other, and then had the correct form of the equation in something less than 10 seconds. To this day, when I have to remember relationships like between velocity, frequency and wavelength, I use units to remember the relationship, and don't bother memorizing it. Like this:

[tex]\lambda [m] = \frac{v [m/s]}{f [1/s]}[/tex]

What a great trick. I also use it in very complex calculations, to help me catch my math errors as I go along. Every term on one side of an addition equation has to have the same units, or you cannot add them. And the overall units of the lefthand side of the equation has to equal the units of the righthand side.


You're a freaking genius. I never thought about it that way. It wouldn't make sense to say I run one second per meter. But it sounds right to say I run one meter per second.
 
  • #13
dboy83 said:
You're a freaking genius. I never thought about it that way. It wouldn't make sense to say I run one second per meter. But it sounds right to say I run one meter per second.
That's almost exactly what we all said to that one guy in our workgroup. One of "aha" moments in life!:biggrin:
 
  • #14
Tomsk said:
OK, on the right we have a*t^3/2. The dimensions of this are [(L)/(T)^2]*[(T)^3/2], which, by cancelling (T)s reduces to (L)/(T)^1/2. On the left we have only (L), so this equation is not dimensionally correct.


Thanks! I think I see what you are doing now. The only part I found confusing is when you said you got (L)/(T)^1/2. You say the (T's) cancel out, but you have T^3 / T^2 so that would give you just T? so wouldn't the answer be LT/2 ?
 
  • #15
Sorry, I thought the equation was a*t^(3/2), not (a*t^3)/2. Yes, if it's t^3, you'd have (L)(T). The 2 has no units.
 
  • #16
thanks

Tomsk said:
Sorry, I thought the equation was a*t^(3/2), not (a*t^3)/2. Yes, if it's t^3, you'd have (L)(T). The 2 has no units.


Thanks, I got the hang of it now. Not too bad.
 
  • #17
Ok, so this is my first physics class and I cannot seem to wrap my head around it. The previous post have helped a lot.
What about when you have a square root like v(velocity)=sqrt(ax)
 
  • #18
wmsnyder said:
Ok, so this is my first physics class and I cannot seem to wrap my head around it. The previous post have helped a lot.
What about when you have a square root like v(velocity)=sqrt(ax)

Welcome to the PF. (BTW, this thead is years old, but whatever...)

The same always holds, AFAIK, there are no exceptions when it comes to units and math.

[tex]V [m/s] = \sqrt{a [m/s^2] x [m]} = \sqrt{ax} \sqrt{[m^2/s^2]} = \sqrt{ax} [m/s][/tex]
 
  • #19
berkeman said:
Welcome to the PF. (BTW, this thead is years old, but whatever...)

The same always holds, AFAIK, there are no exceptions when it comes to units and math.

[tex]V [m/s] = \sqrt{a [m/s^2] x [m]} = \sqrt{ax} \sqrt{[m^2/s^2]} = \sqrt{ax} [m/s][/tex]

Thanks. I was on the right track just have to remember basic algebra.
 

1. What are dimensionally correct equations?

Dimensionally correct equations are mathematical equations that have consistent units on both sides of the equation. This means that the units of measurement for each term in the equation are compatible and can cancel out, resulting in a unit that makes sense for the given context.

2. Why are dimensionally correct equations important?

Dimensionally correct equations are important because they ensure the accuracy and validity of scientific calculations. They also help to prevent errors and inconsistencies in data analysis and experimental results.

3. How do you check if an equation is dimensionally correct?

To check if an equation is dimensionally correct, you must first identify the units for each term in the equation. Then, make sure that the units on both sides of the equation are the same. If the units are not the same, the equation is not dimensionally correct.

4. Can dimensionally incorrect equations still give accurate results?

No, dimensionally incorrect equations cannot give accurate results. This is because the units of measurement in the equation are not consistent, leading to incorrect calculations and potentially invalid conclusions.

5. Are there any exceptions to the rule of dimensionally correct equations?

Yes, there are some exceptions to the rule of dimensionally correct equations. One exception is in the case of dimensionless quantities, where the units cancel out and do not need to be consistent. Another exception is in the field of theoretical physics, where dimensions may be purposely manipulated for theoretical purposes.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
246
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
785
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
446
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
903
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
321
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
389
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
665
Replies
5
Views
366
Back
Top