Dimensions of interaction/radiation length

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kara386
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions Length
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of radiation length, denoted as ##X_0##, in an electromagnetic calorimeter. The formula provided is ##X_0 = \frac{716.4A}{Z(Z+1)\ln(287/\sqrt{74}}##, where ##X_0## is expressed in g cm-2. The user questions the dimensionality of this expression and seeks clarification on converting ##X_0## to centimeters using density. It is established that dividing ##X_0## by density (##\rho##) indeed yields a length measurement in centimeters, affirming the dimensional consistency of the calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radiation length in particle physics
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic calorimeters
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis
  • Basic principles of density and its application in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of radiation length in particle physics
  • Explore the role of density in converting units of measurement
  • Study the properties and applications of electromagnetic calorimeters
  • Learn about dimensional analysis techniques in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and students involved in particle physics, particularly those working with electromagnetic calorimeters and radiation length calculations.

Kara386
Messages
204
Reaction score
2
I've been given that in an electromagnetic calorimeter the radiation length of a material consisting of a single nucleus is:
##X_0 = \frac{716.4A}{Z(Z+1)\ln(287/\sqrt{74}}##

Where ##X_0## is in g ##cm^{-2}##. How can it be in those units when everything in that expression is dimensionless? It's possible I'm meant to use density to calculate ##X_0## in the correct units somehow.

Thanks for any help!
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Ok, change of question. Assuming ##X_0## is originally calculated in g##cm^{-2}##, can I use density to somehow calculate the value in cm instead? cm seems like a more sensible unit for a length. And dimensionally dividing a quantity in g##cm^{-2}## by g##cm^{-3}## gives cm, is there any justification for why ##\frac{X_0}{\rho}## would give ##X_0## in cm? Rather than some quantity completely different to radiation length?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K