Dipole Moment of a Hollow Sphere, simplify calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter LeoJakob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipole Sphere
LeoJakob
Messages
24
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Consider the non-uniformly charged hollow sphere with radius ##R## and charge density##
\rho(\vec{r})=\rho_{0} \cos \theta \delta(r-R) .##
Calculate the dipole moment ##\vec{p}##
Relevant Equations
##
\vec{p}=\int \vec{r} \rho(\vec{r})\mathrm{d}^{3} r .
##
is there an easier way to calculate the dipole moment? I described ## \vec r## in spherical coordinates. I thought at first that due to the symmetry I can assume that dipole-moment only points in the ##z##-direction, but the charge distribution is inhomogeneous, so I made the following calculation:
My calculation results in $$\vec{p}=\int \vec{r} \rho(\vec{r}) \mathrm{d}^{3} r=\int \limits_{0}^{2 \pi} \int \limits_{0}^{\pi} \int \limits_{0}^{\infty} R\left(\sin \theta \cos \phi \vec{e}_{x}+\sin \theta \sin \phi \vec{e}_{y}+\cos \theta \vec{e}_{z}\right)r^{2} \cdot \delta(r-R) \rho_{0} \sin \theta \cos \theta d r d \theta d \phi =\frac{4}{3} \rho_{0} R^{3} \overrightarrow{e_{z}}$$

Which is the correct result but the calculation of the integrals took quite some time. In the end I realized that the dipole moment,indeed, only has a ##z##-component, could I have recognized this earlier and thus simplified my calculation? I'm unsure because the charge density is not homogenous.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Weird, I would think that it was only necessary to do a double integral instead of a triple integral to calculate the dipole moment of this specific distribution. My interpretation is that there is only charge on the surface. Ah I see you used the delta function never mind.


I presume ##\theta## refers to the polar angle. ##\cos \theta## is even about the ## z-axis##. If you go ##\theta## clockwise from the z-axis and ##\theta## counterclockwise from the z-axis , draw the vectors, you will see the components in the xy-plane cancel out.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top