Dirac-Delta from Normalization of Continuous Eigenfunctions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the normalization of continuous eigenfunctions as presented in Kitaev's paper on SL(2,R) representations. The normalization condition derived is < f_s | f_{s'} > = 4 π |a_s|^2 \delta(s - s'), where a_s is defined using the Gamma function. The main issue arises from the treatment of the integral near the endpoint u=1, leading to a sign discrepancy in the results. The participant attempts to resolve this by splitting the integral and applying asymptotic expansions, but encounters additional non-Dirac delta terms that complicate the normalization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuous eigenfunctions and their normalization in quantum mechanics.
  • Familiarity with the properties of the Dirac delta function in distribution theory.
  • Knowledge of complex analysis, specifically the Gamma function and its applications.
  • Experience with integral calculus, particularly handling singular integrals and asymptotic expansions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Dirac delta function and its role in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the normalization of eigenfunctions in the context of SL(2,R) representations.
  • Investigate techniques for evaluating singular integrals, particularly near endpoints.
  • Explore advanced topics in complex analysis, focusing on the Gamma function and its implications in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and researchers working on quantum mechanics, particularly those studying representation theory and eigenfunction normalization methods.

MultipleSearching
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy
\langle f_s | f_{s&#039;} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s&#039;}(u) \, du. \tag{67}
The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form
f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}
f_{s&#039;}(u) is also given by this expression but with s \to s&#039;, where s, s&#039; \in \mathbb{R}^+ and where a_s, a_{s&#039;} \in \mathbb{C} are complex coefficients in terms of s, s&#039;, respectively, given by
a_s = \frac{\Gamma(-2i s)}{\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2} - i s + l\right) \Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2} - i s + r\right)}.
Using these approximations, they immediately present in equation (70) the normalization condition
\langle f_s | f_{s&#039;} \rangle = 4 \pi |a_s|^2 \delta(s - s&#039;). \tag{70}
which is what I'm trying to obtain. My attempt at solving this involved splitting the integral into two, as follows
\int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s&#039;}(u) \, du = \int_{0}^{1 - e^{-1/\varepsilon}} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s&#039;}(u) , du + \int_{1 - e^{-1/\varepsilon}}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s&#039;}(u) \, du
and solving for the latter, which contains the divergent part. I used the u \to 1 approximation presented above and simplified the expression to a sum of 4 terms. Each term is an integral of the form (singular endpoint – problem arises here)
\mathcal{I} = \int_{1 - e^{-1/\varepsilon}}^{1} (1-u)^{i(s + s&#039;) - 1} , du = -\frac{i e^{-i(s + s&#039;)/\varepsilon}}{s + s&#039;}.
After integrating all terms and using the following identities (in the distributional sense)
\lim_{a \to \infty} \frac{\sin(a x)}{\pi x} = \delta(x), \quad \lim_{a \to \infty} \cos(a x) = 0,
I got
\mathcal{I} = -4 \pi |a_s|^2 \delta(s - s&#039;).
I believe the problem comes from the way I solved the \mathcal{I} integral, which leads to a sign discrepancy between what I obtained and the paper.

I've also tried the integral
\int_{0}^{1 - e^{-1/\varepsilon}} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s&#039;}(u) \, du
Eventhough we're using an asymptotic expansion for u \to 1, I considered these limits since the dominant contribution to the Dirac delta function lies near u=1. This produces the correct sign for the normalization as seen in Kitaev's paper, but it also yields non-Dirac delta terms that don't cancel out. Namely
\int_0^1 \frac{2 du}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u) f_{s&#039;}^*(u) = 4 \pi |a_s|^2 \delta(s-s&#039;) + \frac{4 \Im(a_s a_{s&#039;})}{s+s&#039;} + \frac{4 \Im(a_s a_{s&#039;}^*)}{s-s&#039;}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For advice, use # # equation here # # for express equations, or $ $ equation here centered $ $. And use both like this $$ ## without the space.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K