A Dirac-Delta from Normalization of Continuous Eigenfunctions

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the normalization of continuous eigenfunctions in the context of SL(2,R) representations as outlined in Kitaev's paper. The integral for the inner product contains a singular contribution at the endpoint, leading to a Dirac delta function normalization condition. Attempts to resolve the integral by splitting it into two parts reveal discrepancies in sign when comparing results with the paper. While one approach yields the correct sign for the normalization, it introduces non-Dirac delta terms that do not cancel out. The challenge lies in accurately handling the singular behavior of the integral near the endpoint u=1.
MultipleSearching
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy
\langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67}
The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form
f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}
f_{s'}(u) is also given by this expression but with s \to s', where s, s' \in \mathbb{R}^+ and where a_s, a_{s'} \in \mathbb{C} are complex coefficients in terms of s, s', respectively, given by
a_s = \frac{\Gamma(-2i s)}{\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2} - i s + l\right) \Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2} - i s + r\right)}.
Using these approximations, they immediately present in equation (70) the normalization condition
\langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = 4 \pi |a_s|^2 \delta(s - s'). \tag{70}
which is what I'm trying to obtain. My attempt at solving this involved splitting the integral into two, as follows
\int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du = \int_{0}^{1 - e^{-1/\varepsilon}} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) , du + \int_{1 - e^{-1/\varepsilon}}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du
and solving for the latter, which contains the divergent part. I used the u \to 1 approximation presented above and simplified the expression to a sum of 4 terms. Each term is an integral of the form (singular endpoint – problem arises here)
\mathcal{I} = \int_{1 - e^{-1/\varepsilon}}^{1} (1-u)^{i(s + s') - 1} , du = -\frac{i e^{-i(s + s')/\varepsilon}}{s + s'}.
After integrating all terms and using the following identities (in the distributional sense)
\lim_{a \to \infty} \frac{\sin(a x)}{\pi x} = \delta(x), \quad \lim_{a \to \infty} \cos(a x) = 0,
I got
\mathcal{I} = -4 \pi |a_s|^2 \delta(s - s').
I believe the problem comes from the way I solved the \mathcal{I} integral, which leads to a sign discrepancy between what I obtained and the paper.

I've also tried the integral
\int_{0}^{1 - e^{-1/\varepsilon}} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du
Eventhough we're using an asymptotic expansion for u \to 1, I considered these limits since the dominant contribution to the Dirac delta function lies near u=1. This produces the correct sign for the normalization as seen in Kitaev's paper, but it also yields non-Dirac delta terms that don't cancel out. Namely
\int_0^1 \frac{2 du}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u) f_{s'}^*(u) = 4 \pi |a_s|^2 \delta(s-s') + \frac{4 \Im(a_s a_{s'})}{s+s'} + \frac{4 \Im(a_s a_{s'}^*)}{s-s'}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For advice, use # # equation here # # for express equations, or $ $ equation here centered $ $. And use both like this $$ ## without the space.
 
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...