Dirac delta function how did they prove this?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
galactic
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I'm familiar with the fact that the dirac delta function (when defined within an integral is even)

Meaning delta(x)= delta(-x) on the interval -a to b when integral signs are present

I want to prove this this relationship but I don't know how to do it other than with a limit maybe

Book said they proved it using a change of variables and changing limits of integration but I can't see how they proved it? Does anyone know how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you have written is pretty much meaningless. The "Dirac Delta function" is not a function at all. It is a "distribution" or "generalized function" which means it is applied to functions, not numbers as are ordinary functions. In particular, that means that we do not define either [itex]\delta(x)[/itex] or [itex]\delta(-x)[/itex] for specific values of x. What is true is that [itex]\delta[/itex] applied to an odd function is 0.