Dirac delta function proof fourier space

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the transformation of the Dirac Delta function, specifically that $$\delta(t_1 - t_2)$$ in the time domain corresponds to $$\delta(\omega_1 + \omega_2)$$ in the frequency domain (Fourier space). Participants emphasize the need for clarity in the problem statement and the importance of context in understanding the transformation process. The Fourier transform of the Dirac Delta function is highlighted, with the assertion that it is not merely another delta distribution but involves complex exponentials. The conclusion suggests that with proper context and assumptions, the transformation can be understood and resolved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirac Delta function properties
  • Familiarity with Fourier transforms and their applications
  • Knowledge of complex exponentials in signal processing
  • Ability to interpret mathematical problem statements accurately
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Dirac Delta function in both time and frequency domains
  • Learn about the Fourier transform and its implications for distributions
  • Explore the relationship between time-domain and frequency-domain representations
  • Review examples of 2D Fourier transforms and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with signal processing, particularly those dealing with Fourier analysis and the Dirac Delta function.

jhartc90
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am having trouble understanding this:

I have a Dirac Delta function

$$ \delta (t_1-t_2) $$

but I want to prove that in the frequency domain (Fourier Space), it is:

$$\delta(\omega_1+\omega_2) $$

Would anyone have any ideas how to go about solving this problem?

I know that t1 and t2 are two independent times, and that w1 and w2 are two independent frequencies. But I do not fully understand what this question wants/is asking?

Homework Equations


[/B]
The only relevant equations I could think of may just be transforms found in a table.

The Attempt at a Solution


Hard for me to attempt when I don't really understand what the question means,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Dirac delta distribution is what it is. It is unclear what you mean by it "being" ##\delta(t_1-t_2)##, this is just insertion of some argument. A delta distribution in real space has a Fourier transform which is of the form ##e^{i\omega t_0}## and not another delta distribution.

In order for us to help you, you need to specify your problem better. In particular, you need to provide the problem itself where this appeared and keep the wording exactly as provided.
 
I attached the file. We are suppose to also state any assumptions we make.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    24.9 KB · Views: 518
I believe we need more context than this. It is not clear to me how to interpret this question and for the interpretations I can think of it does not make sense.
 
Orodruin said:
I believe we need more context than this. It is not clear to me how to interpret this question and for the interpretations I can think of it does not make sense.
It is in time and not space. We have a 2D Fourier transform. If the function is transformed correctly twice, due to two times and two frequencies, the answer should be able to be obtained.
 
I think i may have figured it out, perhaps the thread should be closed?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
885
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K