This is probably a stupid question, but when I apply the Euler-Lagrange equation to the Lagrangian density of the Dirac field I get for the conjugate field(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\bar{\psi} (-i \partial_\mu \gamma^{\mu} -m) = 0[/tex] (derivative acts to the left).

But when I take a hermitian conjugate of the Dirac equation for the field I get an extra [tex]\gamma^0[/tex]:

[tex]0 = \left[ (i \partial_\mu \gamma^{\mu} -m)\psi \right]^\dagger = \psi^\dagger (-i \partial_\mu (\gamma^{\mu})^\dagger -m) = \psi^\dagger (-i \partial_\mu \gamma^0 \gamma^{\mu} \gamma^0 -m) = \psi^\dagger \gamma^0(-i \partial_\mu \gamma^{\mu} \gamma^0 -m) = \bar{\psi} (-i \partial_\mu \gamma^{\mu} \gamma^0 -m)[/tex].

What am I missing?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Dirac equation for the conjugated field

Loading...

Similar Threads - Dirac equation conjugated | Date |
---|---|

I Simplify the Dirac Energy Equation? | Monday at 11:18 AM |

I Use the Dirac Equation to calculate transition frequencies in Hydrogen | Mar 6, 2018 |

Charge conjugation matrix and Dirac equation's solutions | Sep 20, 2015 |

Does charge conjugation affect parity? | Jul 8, 2015 |

Hermitian conjugation and conserved current in the Dirac equation | Nov 24, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**