Dirac, Majorana & a missing factor of 2

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter EL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dirac Majorana
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences in Feynman rules for Dirac and Majorana neutrinos, particularly in the context of the scattering process involving electron and positron interactions leading to neutrino production. The calculation of the unpolarized differential cross section follows the electroweak Feynman rules, with the total cross section derived by integrating over angles and applying a symmetry factor of 1/2 for identical particles in the final state, specifically Majorana neutrinos. The author identifies a discrepancy in results for Majorana and Dirac neutrinos, questioning the existence of a missing factor of 2 that reconciles the predictions regarding neutrino species and Z width measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman rules in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of electroweak interactions
  • Familiarity with differential cross section calculations
  • Concept of Majorana vs Dirac particles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of Feynman rules for Majorana neutrinos
  • Study the implications of symmetry factors in particle physics
  • Explore the relationship between neutrino species and Z boson decay width
  • Investigate the role of identical particles in scattering processes
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, theoretical physicists, and students studying quantum field theory who are interested in neutrino properties and interactions.

EL
Science Advisor
Messages
558
Reaction score
0
A question concerning Feynman rules for Dirac vs Majorana neutrinos.

Take e.g. the scattering process:
electron + positron -> electron neutrino + electron antineutrino.

Following the electroweak Feynman rules we can calculate an expression for the unpolarized differential cross section.
The total cross section is then obtained by integrating over the angels, and, in the case of identical particles in the final state (as would be the case for Majorana neutrinos which are their own antiparticles), multiply by the symmetry factor 1/2.

So, to me it seems this procedure would give different results for Majorana and Dirac neutrinos. I'm definitely missing something here, since obviously this cannot be the case. (E.g. the number of neutrino species predicted from data from measurements of the Z width should hold no matter if the neutrinos are Majorana or Dirac.)

Where is the missing factor of 2?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K