Dirac spinors in non-relativistic limit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that in the non-relativistic limit, the lower two components of the positive energy solutions to the Dirac equation are smaller than the upper two components by a factor of ##\beta##. The spinor is expressed as $$\psi = \begin{pmatrix} \phi \\ \frac {\vec \sigma \cdot \vec p} {E + m} \phi \end{pmatrix}$$, where ##\phi## is a 2-component spinor and ##\sigma## represents the Pauli matrices. In the non-relativistic limit, with ##E = \gamma m## and ##\gamma \rightarrow 1##, the expression simplifies to $$\psi = \begin{pmatrix} \phi \\ \frac {\vec \sigma \cdot \vec v} {2} \phi \end{pmatrix}$$, leading to confusion regarding the treatment of the term ##\vec \sigma \cdot \vec v## and its relation to the factor of ##\beta##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirac spinors and the Dirac equation
  • Familiarity with non-relativistic quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of Pauli matrices and their applications
  • Basic concepts of relativistic energy-momentum relations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the non-relativistic limit of the Dirac equation
  • Explore the properties and applications of Pauli matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the significance of the factor ##\beta## in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the implications of spinor normalization in relativistic quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, as well as students studying the Dirac equation and its applications in particle physics.

Thomas Brady
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
So, I have to show that in the non-relativistic limit the lower two components of the positive energy solutions to the Dirac equation are smaller than the upper two components by a factor of ##\beta##.

I started with the spinor $$\psi = \begin{pmatrix} \phi \\ \frac {\vec \sigma \cdot \vec p} {E + m} \phi \end{pmatrix}$$ (##\phi## is a 2-component spinor and this doesn't include the normalization factor or the exponential)
The ##\sigma## being the Pauli matrices. Then I noted that in the non-relativistic limit ##E = \gamma m## and ##\gamma \rightarrow 1## so the denominator of the lower component is ##2m## and ##\vec p = m\vec v## in the non-relativistic limit so the m's cancel in the numerator and the denominator and I'm left with

$$\psi = \begin{pmatrix} \phi \\ \frac {\vec \sigma \cdot \vec v} {2} \phi \end{pmatrix}$$

so now I'm confused as to what to do with the ##\vec \sigma \cdot \vec v##. It seems like what I could try to do would leave the lower two components a factor of ##\frac \beta 2## smaller than the numerator.rather than just ##\beta##. So how do I approach this ##\vec \sigma \cdot \vec v##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
P.S. I used n.u. for this
 
I think that the question is meant to ask you to show that the lower two components are smaller than the upper two components by a factor of order ##\beta## (even though it wasn't stated that way explicitly.) So, you don't need to distinguish between a factor of ##\beta## and a factor of ##\beta/2##. Hope I'm not misinterpreting things here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K