Direct and indirect proportion

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sgstudent
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the concepts of direct and indirect proportion, specifically addressing the equation y = -2x. It establishes that the term "direct proportion" refers to the relationship where one variable increases while the other decreases, depending on the sign of the constant k. The key takeaway is that direct proportion is defined by the power of x being 1, while inverse proportion is characterized by the power of x being -1. This distinction is rooted in historical mathematical principles, as noted in Euclid's "Elements".

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear equations and their graphs
  • Familiarity with the concepts of direct and inverse proportions
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical ratios and proportions
  • Awareness of historical mathematical texts, such as Euclid's "Elements"
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear equations in detail
  • Explore the concept of inverse proportions and their applications
  • Review mathematical ratios and their significance in problem-solving
  • Investigate historical mathematical concepts and their evolution over time
USEFUL FOR

Students learning algebra, educators teaching mathematical concepts, and anyone interested in the historical context of mathematical theories.

sgstudent
Messages
726
Reaction score
3
I read that y=-2x is a direct proportion graph. But how is this so? Since as one variable increases the other variable decreases proportionately so how can this be considered to be a direct proportion case? So does it mean that k>0? Since when it is less than 0 it then becomes a case which does not fit into any of the scenarios? Or if we were to write it then since it decreases proportionately then the graph would be written as y=2/x. So on the whole, will k always be positive?

Thanks for the help guys! :smile:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi, sgstudent,
the notions of "direct" and "indirect" proportion are taught at an early age, where possibly they don't want to complicate the picture with negative numbers. The important fact is the power of x (1 or -1), rather than whether the result increases or decreases (the two notions, of course, coincide for positive quantities).

The terms come from the idea of a "proportion" or "ratio":<br /> \frac y a = \frac k x<br />or, "y is to a as k is to x". You can always write this proportion so that y is "above" (in the numerator) of the left-hand side (flip the whole thing otherwise). Then you have only two cases for x: either it is "up" or it is "down". One you call it "direct", the other "inverse". There's nothing more to it. It's a notion as old as the ancient Greeks, as it already shows itself in book V of Euclid's "Elements"; he would talk in the context of distances or measures, though, which were always non-negative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K