MHB Direct solution for two unknowns in two equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter IanfromBristol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Unknowns
IanfromBristol
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am writing a computer program to solve a physical problem which at some part involves the following two equations and two unknowns;

(1) \[ C_1(x^4-y^4) + C_2x = Q_1 \]
(2) \[ C_1(y^4-x^4) + C_3y = Q_2 \]

C1, C2 & C3 are coefficients which can readily be calculated and do not rely on knowing the values of X or Y. Q1 and Q2 are known values (effectively boundary conditions). I've tried substitution and elimination but end up with a much more complicated expression which looks to be a quartic equation. I know I can solve this iteratively and it does converge quickly and is stable. However, is there any method that can solve it directly and thus avoid the iterative approach?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I see no way to avoid the quartic. There is a method to do this to get an exact answer (here) but I'd stick with approximation. It's much easier to work out.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
I see no way to avoid the quartic. There is a method to do this to get an exact answer (here) but I'd stick with approximation. It's much easier to work out.

-Dan
Hi Dan, I took a look at that solution for the quartic and you're not wrong the iterative method (i.e. approximation) is far easier to work out!

Ian
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top