Direct Sum/Product of Groups Clarification?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shallumstuart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups
Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies the operations involved in the direct sum/product of groups, specifically for (Z4 x Z2, +mod2). The correct method for adding elements is to perform component-wise addition, using mod 4 for the first component from Z4 and mod 2 for the second component from Z2. The confusion arises from the notation "+mod2," which suggests a single operation for both components, but in reality, each component operates under its respective modulus. The example (1,1) + (2,1) correctly results in (3,0) when applying the appropriate operations. Ultimately, the notation may be misleading, as it implies a uniform operation across both components.
shallumstuart
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a pretty basic question about direct sum/product of groups.

Say you were given the group (Z4 x Z2, +mod2). Now I know that Z4 x Z2 is given by { (0,0), (0,1), (1,0), (1,1), (2,0), (2,1), (3,0), (3,1) }. So now if you were going to add together two of the elements using the binary operation +mod2, e.g. doing (1,1) +mod2 (2,1). Does this give you:

(1,1) +mod2 (2,1) = (1+2,1+1) = (3,2) = (1,0)?
I'm pretty sure that this is correct, but I thought another possibility might have been that you add the first two elements in mod4 and the second two in mod 2

e.g. (1,1) + (2,1) = (3,2) = (3,0).

Help clarifying would be super.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition of the direct product of two groups G and H is that you multiply (or add in the abelian case) componentwise using the operation in the given component. So in Z4 x Z2 the operation is the second one you did, e.g. (1,1) + (2,1) = (3,0). Of course to get the first thing you had (e.g. (1,1) + (2,1) = (1,0)) you could redefine the operation in Z4 to be addition mod 4, but then you would really have Z2 (so the direct product would be Z2 x Z2). For example with this operation on Z4 we are forced for 3 and 1 to be the same element since 3 - 1 = 2 = 0.
 
thanks that's helpful.

although i still don't quite get the meaning of the +mod2 part. When the group is defined as (Z4 x Z2, +mod2), doesn't the +mod2 tell you the binary operation by which you combine elements of the set? if that's the case, when you add componentwise how come you are adding the first two together in mod4 but the second two in mod2?
 
Last edited:
never mind, i don't actually think it makes any sense to say (Z4 x Z2, +mod2)
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
883
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K