Direct Sums of Noetherian Modules .... Bland Proposition 4.2.7 .... ....

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modules Sums
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Proposition 4.2.7 from Paul E. Bland's "Rings and Their Modules," specifically regarding the isomorphism of each Noetherian module \( M_i \) to a submodule of the direct sum \( \bigoplus_{i=1}^n M_i \). Participants clarify that the natural embedding \( i: M \to M \oplus N \) defined by \( i(x) = (x, 0) \) serves as an injective \( R \)-module homomorphism, demonstrating how \( M \) is indeed a submodule of \( M \oplus N \). The proof relies on the properties of direct sums and the definitions of module homomorphisms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Noetherian and Artinian modules
  • Familiarity with direct sums of modules
  • Knowledge of \( R \)-module homomorphisms
  • Basic concepts of injective functions in algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Noetherian modules in depth
  • Learn about the structure and properties of direct sums in module theory
  • Explore the concept of injective module homomorphisms
  • Review additional examples of submodules in \( R \)-modules
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and graduate students focusing on module theory, particularly those studying Noetherian and Artinian modules in the context of ring theory.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 4.2: Noetherian and Artinian Modules and need some help to fully understand the proof of part of Proposition 4.2.7 ... ...

Proposition 4.2.7 reads as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/8208In the above proof by Paul Bland we read the following:

" ... ... and since each $$M_i$$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $$\bigoplus_{ i = 1 }^n M_i$$ ... ... "Can someone please explain to me how/why each $$M_i$$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $$\bigoplus_{ i = 1 }^n M_i$$ ... ... ?

Do we know what the submodule is ... ?
Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 4.2: Noetherian and Artinian Modules and need some help to fully understand the proof of part of Proposition 4.2.7 ... ...

Proposition 4.2.7 reads as follows:In the above proof by Paul Bland we read the following:

" ... ... and since each $$M_i$$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $$\bigoplus_{ i = 1 }^n M_i$$ ... ... "Can someone please explain to me how/why each $$M_i$$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $$\bigoplus_{ i = 1 }^n M_i$$ ... ... ?

Do we know what the submodule is ... ?
Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
What you are asking is the following: If $M$ and $N$ are $R$-modules, then how is $M$ as submodule of $M\oplus N$? Just unravel the definition of $M\oplus N$. $M\oplus N$ as a set is just $M\times N$, where you add and scale coordinate-wise. So a natural embedding of $M$ into $M\oplus N$ is $i:M\to M\oplus N$ given by $i(x)=(x, 0)$. Do you see why $i$ is an injective $R$-module homomorphism?
 
caffeinemachine said:
What you are asking is the following: If $M$ and $N$ are $R$-modules, then how is $M$ as submodule of $M\oplus N$? Just unravel the definition of $M\oplus N$. $M\oplus N$ as a set is just $M\times N$, where you add and scale coordinate-wise. So a natural embedding of $M$ into $M\oplus N$ is $i:M\to M\oplus N$ given by $i(x)=(x, 0)$. Do you see why $i$ is an injective $R$-module homomorphism?
Thanks for the help, caffeinemachine ... ...

You write:

" ... ... Do you see why $i$ is an injective $R$-module homomorphism? ... ... "

Well ...

$$i( x + y ) = i(x) + i(y)$$ holds because ...

$$i(x+y) = (x+y, 0 ) = (x,0) + (y,0) = i(x) + i(y)$$ ... ...

... and ...

$$i(xa) = i(x) a$$ holds where $$a \in$$ ring $$R$$ holds since ...

$$i(xa) = (xa,0) = (x,0) a = i(x) a$$ ...

So $$i$$ is a homomorphism ...

... and ...

if $$i(x) = i(y)$$ ... then ...

$$(x,0) = (y,0) $$

$$\Longrightarrow x = y$$

... so $$i$$ is injective ...Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K