MHB Direct Sums of Noetherian Modules .... Bland Proposition 4.2.7 .... ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modules Sums
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the proof of Proposition 4.2.7 from Paul E. Bland's "Rings and Their Modules," specifically how each module \( M_i \) is isomorphic to a submodule of the direct sum \( \bigoplus_{i=1}^n M_i \). It is explained that the direct sum \( M \oplus N \) can be viewed as the set \( M \times N \), where a natural embedding \( i: M \to M \oplus N \) is defined by \( i(x) = (x, 0) \). This embedding is shown to be an injective \( R \)-module homomorphism by verifying the properties of homomorphisms and injectivity. The discussion emphasizes the clarity of the embedding and the proof's logical structure. Understanding this concept is essential for grasping the broader implications of Noetherian modules in the context of the proposition.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 4.2: Noetherian and Artinian Modules and need some help to fully understand the proof of part of Proposition 4.2.7 ... ...

Proposition 4.2.7 reads as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/8208In the above proof by Paul Bland we read the following:

" ... ... and since each $$M_i$$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $$\bigoplus_{ i = 1 }^n M_i$$ ... ... "Can someone please explain to me how/why each $$M_i$$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $$\bigoplus_{ i = 1 }^n M_i$$ ... ... ?

Do we know what the submodule is ... ?
Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 4.2: Noetherian and Artinian Modules and need some help to fully understand the proof of part of Proposition 4.2.7 ... ...

Proposition 4.2.7 reads as follows:In the above proof by Paul Bland we read the following:

" ... ... and since each $$M_i$$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $$\bigoplus_{ i = 1 }^n M_i$$ ... ... "Can someone please explain to me how/why each $$M_i$$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $$\bigoplus_{ i = 1 }^n M_i$$ ... ... ?

Do we know what the submodule is ... ?
Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
What you are asking is the following: If $M$ and $N$ are $R$-modules, then how is $M$ as submodule of $M\oplus N$? Just unravel the definition of $M\oplus N$. $M\oplus N$ as a set is just $M\times N$, where you add and scale coordinate-wise. So a natural embedding of $M$ into $M\oplus N$ is $i:M\to M\oplus N$ given by $i(x)=(x, 0)$. Do you see why $i$ is an injective $R$-module homomorphism?
 
caffeinemachine said:
What you are asking is the following: If $M$ and $N$ are $R$-modules, then how is $M$ as submodule of $M\oplus N$? Just unravel the definition of $M\oplus N$. $M\oplus N$ as a set is just $M\times N$, where you add and scale coordinate-wise. So a natural embedding of $M$ into $M\oplus N$ is $i:M\to M\oplus N$ given by $i(x)=(x, 0)$. Do you see why $i$ is an injective $R$-module homomorphism?
Thanks for the help, caffeinemachine ... ...

You write:

" ... ... Do you see why $i$ is an injective $R$-module homomorphism? ... ... "

Well ...

$$i( x + y ) = i(x) + i(y)$$ holds because ...

$$i(x+y) = (x+y, 0 ) = (x,0) + (y,0) = i(x) + i(y)$$ ... ...

... and ...

$$i(xa) = i(x) a$$ holds where $$a \in$$ ring $$R$$ holds since ...

$$i(xa) = (xa,0) = (x,0) a = i(x) a$$ ...

So $$i$$ is a homomorphism ...

... and ...

if $$i(x) = i(y)$$ ... then ...

$$(x,0) = (y,0) $$

$$\Longrightarrow x = y$$

... so $$i$$ is injective ...Peter
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K