MHB Direct Sums of Noetherian Modules .... Bland Proposition 4.2.7 .... ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modules Sums
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 4.2: Noetherian and Artinian Modules and need some help to fully understand the proof of part of Proposition 4.2.7 ... ...

Proposition 4.2.7 reads as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/8208In the above proof by Paul Bland we read the following:

" ... ... and since each $$M_i$$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $$\bigoplus_{ i = 1 }^n M_i$$ ... ... "Can someone please explain to me how/why each $$M_i$$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $$\bigoplus_{ i = 1 }^n M_i$$ ... ... ?

Do we know what the submodule is ... ?
Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 4.2: Noetherian and Artinian Modules and need some help to fully understand the proof of part of Proposition 4.2.7 ... ...

Proposition 4.2.7 reads as follows:In the above proof by Paul Bland we read the following:

" ... ... and since each $$M_i$$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $$\bigoplus_{ i = 1 }^n M_i$$ ... ... "Can someone please explain to me how/why each $$M_i$$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $$\bigoplus_{ i = 1 }^n M_i$$ ... ... ?

Do we know what the submodule is ... ?
Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
What you are asking is the following: If $M$ and $N$ are $R$-modules, then how is $M$ as submodule of $M\oplus N$? Just unravel the definition of $M\oplus N$. $M\oplus N$ as a set is just $M\times N$, where you add and scale coordinate-wise. So a natural embedding of $M$ into $M\oplus N$ is $i:M\to M\oplus N$ given by $i(x)=(x, 0)$. Do you see why $i$ is an injective $R$-module homomorphism?
 
caffeinemachine said:
What you are asking is the following: If $M$ and $N$ are $R$-modules, then how is $M$ as submodule of $M\oplus N$? Just unravel the definition of $M\oplus N$. $M\oplus N$ as a set is just $M\times N$, where you add and scale coordinate-wise. So a natural embedding of $M$ into $M\oplus N$ is $i:M\to M\oplus N$ given by $i(x)=(x, 0)$. Do you see why $i$ is an injective $R$-module homomorphism?
Thanks for the help, caffeinemachine ... ...

You write:

" ... ... Do you see why $i$ is an injective $R$-module homomorphism? ... ... "

Well ...

$$i( x + y ) = i(x) + i(y)$$ holds because ...

$$i(x+y) = (x+y, 0 ) = (x,0) + (y,0) = i(x) + i(y)$$ ... ...

... and ...

$$i(xa) = i(x) a$$ holds where $$a \in$$ ring $$R$$ holds since ...

$$i(xa) = (xa,0) = (x,0) a = i(x) a$$ ...

So $$i$$ is a homomorphism ...

... and ...

if $$i(x) = i(y)$$ ... then ...

$$(x,0) = (y,0) $$

$$\Longrightarrow x = y$$

... so $$i$$ is injective ...Peter
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top