MHB Direct Sums of Noetherian Modules .... Bland Proposition 4.2.7 .... ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modules Sums
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 4.2: Noetherian and Artinian Modules and need some help to fully understand the proof of part of Proposition 4.2.7 ... ...

Proposition 4.2.7 reads as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/8208In the above proof by Paul Bland we read the following:

" ... ... and since each $$M_i$$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $$\bigoplus_{ i = 1 }^n M_i$$ ... ... "Can someone please explain to me how/why each $$M_i$$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $$\bigoplus_{ i = 1 }^n M_i$$ ... ... ?

Do we know what the submodule is ... ?
Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 4.2: Noetherian and Artinian Modules and need some help to fully understand the proof of part of Proposition 4.2.7 ... ...

Proposition 4.2.7 reads as follows:In the above proof by Paul Bland we read the following:

" ... ... and since each $$M_i$$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $$\bigoplus_{ i = 1 }^n M_i$$ ... ... "Can someone please explain to me how/why each $$M_i$$ is isomorphic to a submodule of $$\bigoplus_{ i = 1 }^n M_i$$ ... ... ?

Do we know what the submodule is ... ?
Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
What you are asking is the following: If $M$ and $N$ are $R$-modules, then how is $M$ as submodule of $M\oplus N$? Just unravel the definition of $M\oplus N$. $M\oplus N$ as a set is just $M\times N$, where you add and scale coordinate-wise. So a natural embedding of $M$ into $M\oplus N$ is $i:M\to M\oplus N$ given by $i(x)=(x, 0)$. Do you see why $i$ is an injective $R$-module homomorphism?
 
caffeinemachine said:
What you are asking is the following: If $M$ and $N$ are $R$-modules, then how is $M$ as submodule of $M\oplus N$? Just unravel the definition of $M\oplus N$. $M\oplus N$ as a set is just $M\times N$, where you add and scale coordinate-wise. So a natural embedding of $M$ into $M\oplus N$ is $i:M\to M\oplus N$ given by $i(x)=(x, 0)$. Do you see why $i$ is an injective $R$-module homomorphism?
Thanks for the help, caffeinemachine ... ...

You write:

" ... ... Do you see why $i$ is an injective $R$-module homomorphism? ... ... "

Well ...

$$i( x + y ) = i(x) + i(y)$$ holds because ...

$$i(x+y) = (x+y, 0 ) = (x,0) + (y,0) = i(x) + i(y)$$ ... ...

... and ...

$$i(xa) = i(x) a$$ holds where $$a \in$$ ring $$R$$ holds since ...

$$i(xa) = (xa,0) = (x,0) a = i(x) a$$ ...

So $$i$$ is a homomorphism ...

... and ...

if $$i(x) = i(y)$$ ... then ...

$$(x,0) = (y,0) $$

$$\Longrightarrow x = y$$

... so $$i$$ is injective ...Peter
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K