Direction of a single particle wave

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conceptualization of a single particle wave, particularly in relation to the double-slit experiment. Participants agree that while a single electron can be emitted in a specific direction, it can still be represented as a spherical wave expanding in all directions. This wave representation is crucial for understanding how interference patterns arise, as even single electrons can interfere with themselves, indicating they travel in multiple directions simultaneously. The consensus emphasizes the importance of viewing the wave as a probability density rather than a fixed trajectory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Familiarity with the double-slit experiment
  • Basic knowledge of wave-particle duality
  • Concept of probability density in quantum physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical framework of quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of wave-particle duality in quantum theory
  • Study the concept of probability waves and their role in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate advanced interpretations of the double-slit experiment
USEFUL FOR

Amateur physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of wave-particle duality and interference patterns in quantum systems.

Gerinski
Amateur level.

Popular Science books usually start describing the double-slit experiment in terms of waves, by showing a drawing in which waves are pictured as concentrical circles emerging from the source. When passing through the slits, new concentrical circles are drawn emerging from each slit.
When the circles reach the screen it's easy to understand the building up of interference.

Then they go on saying that you may tune the source beam so that it emits a single particle (eg an electron) at a time. This gives me a problem for understanding the wave picture.

A concentrical circle expands from the source point or slit towards every direction (the circle is a 2-dimension drawing but obviously it represents concentrical spheres).
But when we consider a single particle, obviously it can not travel to any and every direction.

When we think of the beam firing a single particle at a time, and we want to use the wave picture, can we think of it as a spherical wave expanding in all directions? this would seem weird!
Or do we have to think of it as an ondulation traveling along a single line direction as we do when we use the point-particle picture?

But if we think of the wave as an ondulation along a single line, it becomes difficult to see how interference would build up, doesn't it?

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, as nobody posted any reply in 4 days, I wonder if my question was too stupid to deserve any.
Even if the answer is that the question is worthless I would appreciate someone to tell me.

Maybe to clarify a bit, when I say "thinking of a wave as an ondulation traveling along a single line", I do not mean actually "a single straight line", otherwise it would be no big difference with the particle picture.

What I imagine is more something like "a wave traveling towards a definite direction, which would be "strongest" along that direction line path, and as the angle gets bigger away from the direction path, the wave gets dimmer and dimmer."
 
Gerinski said:
A concentrical circle expands from the source point or slit towards every direction (the circle is a 2-dimension drawing but obviously it represents concentrical spheres).
But when we consider a single particle, obviously it can not travel to any and every direction.

You have to view, in this case, the wave as the probability density location of the particle. Hence a single particle may have a non nul probability density in a given area of the space but it may only be located on a given location.

Seratend.
 
When we think of the beam firing a single particle at a time, and we want to use the wave picture, can we think of it as a spherical wave expanding in all directions? this would seem weird!
Or do we have to think of it as an ondulation traveling along a single line direction as we do when we use the point-particle picture?

From the perspective of another amateur (ie: I don't know the math of QM) I believe a photon can be thought of as being emitted in a random direction as the electron moves from one energy state to another, with the photon having an energy equal to the energy given up by the electron. So you would be correct to consider it a spherical wave expanding in all directions. However, once it's created, it can be manipulated into a beam.
 
Gerinski said:
When we think of the beam firing a single particle at a time, and we want to use the wave picture, can we think of it as a spherical wave expanding in all directions? this would seem weird!

Yes, you can use the spherical wave picture for a single electron. We all think it's weird too.

Gerinski said:
Or do we have to think of it as an ondulation traveling along a single line direction as we do when we use the point-particle picture?

No, we can't think of it this way. The experimental evidence is pretty clear in indicating that even single electrons interefere with themselves. In order to interfere with themselves (and produce those interference patterns), the electron must travel in more than one direction on emission.

Now that you've lost your virginity as far as the electron going in two directions at once, you might as well go the rest of the way and assume that the electron travels in all directions at the same time. Thus the spherical waves that you saw in the Popular Science article.

Carl
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
746
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K