Directional and Partial Derivatives ....Notation .... D&K ....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the notation for directional and partial derivatives as presented in "Multidimensional Real Analysis I: Differentiation" by J. J. Duistermaat and J. A. C. Kolk (D&K). The user seeks clarification on the equivalence of D&K's notation and the common partial derivatives notation, specifically the Jacobi notation. Peter confirms the correctness of the notation and recommends Wolfgang Walter's book on differential equations and Roseenwasser's texts on autonomous control systems for further insights into similar notational conventions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of directional and partial derivatives
  • Familiarity with Jacobi notation
  • Basic knowledge of differential equations
  • Experience with sensitivity analysis in control systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Multidimensional Real Analysis I: Differentiation" by J. J. Duistermaat and J. A. C. Kolk
  • Explore Wolfgang Walter's book on differential equations
  • Study Roseenwasser's books on autonomous control systems
  • Research the application of sensitivity analysis in various mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis, differential equations, and control systems, will benefit from this discussion.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading "Multidimensional Real Analysis I: Differentiation" by J. J. Duistermaat and J. A. C. Kolk ...

I am focused on Chapter 2: Differentiation ... ...

I need help with an aspect of D&K's notation for directional and partial derivatives ... ...

D&K's definition of directional and partial derivatives reads as follows:View attachment 7855In a previous post I have demonstrated that $$D_j f(a) = D_{ e_j} f(a) = D f(a) e_j = \begin{pmatrix} D_j f_1 (a) \\ D_j f_2 (a) \\ D_j f_3 (a) \\ ... \\ ... \\ ... \\ D_j f_p (a) \end{pmatrix}$$
I am assuming that in the common 'partials' notation ( Jacobi notation ) that the above can be expressed as follows:
$$D_j f(a) = \frac{ \partial f }{ \partial x_j } = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{ \partial f_1 }{ \partial x_j } (a) \\ \frac{ \partial f_2 }{ \partial x_j } (a) \\ \frac{ \partial f_3 }{ \partial x_j } (a) \\ ... \\ ... \\ ... \\\frac{ \partial f_p }{ \partial x_j } (a) \end{pmatrix}$$Is that correct use of notation/terminology ...?

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Check out Wolfgang Walter's book on DE's. Or Roseenwasser's books on autonomous control systems using sensitivity analysis. Notation is similar in both.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K