Discharging capacitor, the differential equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the differential equations governing the behavior of a discharging capacitor in an electrical circuit, specifically applying Kirchhoff's loop rule. Participants are exploring the implications of current direction and charge change during the discharging process.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the application of Kirchhoff's loop rule in the context of a discharging capacitor, particularly regarding the sign conventions for current and charge. There is a discussion about the implications of the absence of an emf device and how it affects the differential equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants are providing insights into the sign of dq/dt during discharge and the interpretation of current direction. There is acknowledgment of confusion stemming from textbook explanations, and a collaborative effort to clarify the underlying principles is evident.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of the absence of a battery in the circuit and how that affects the equations used to describe the system. There is also a mention of initial conditions that may influence the interpretation of the results.

Sefrez
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
First applying Kirchhoff's loop rule with an ideal emf device with potential difference V, a capacitor with capacitance C, and a resistor with resistance R, you get:
V - q/C - iR = 0 or V = q/C + dq/dt*R

For charging a capacitor. This makes sense. But for a discharging capacitor in the same circuit but without the emf device, you have the differential equation: q/C + dq/dt*R = 0

But this makes no sense to me. The current is in the other direction when the capacitor is being discharged. The higher potential side marks the direction of that current. That being said, applying Kirchhoff's loop rule, you end up with -iR + q/C = 0 which is not the same.

Am I applying the rule incorrectly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if i am not wrong dq/dt is negative in case of discharging
 
Oh, that might be correct. It has to be stated as negative in the differential to indicate decreasing of charge. My book through me off. It simply used the excuse that the battery is no longer present and thus V = q/C + dq/dt*R becomes 0 = q/C + dq/dt*R. When really there is more going on. Thanks. :)
 
Sefrez said:
q/C + dq/dt*R = 0

But this makes no sense to me. The current is in the other direction when the capacitor is being discharged. The higher potential side marks the direction of that current. That being said, applying Kirchhoff's loop rule, you end up with -iR + q/C = 0 which is not the same.

Am I applying the rule incorrectly?

The homogeneous part of the equation is the same, but solving the equation with the initial condition q=Q0 at t=0, you get negative current and negative dq/dt. Kushan is right, the current flows in the opposite direction during discharge and the charge of the capacitor decreases which makes dq/dt negative.

ehild
 
Yeah, I see. Thanks to both of you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K