MHB Discontinuity: Jump discontinuity

samir
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I earlier posted about point discontinuity. It became overwhelming pretty quickly. Now I would like to focus this thread at jump discontinuity specifically, if you don't mind me posting multiple threads about discontinuity.

From what I understand, "jump discontinuity" occurs where the left-hand limit and right-hand limit for a given are not equal. Correct?

Assume we have the following functions.

$$f(x)=\begin{cases}x^2, & x\leq 1 \\ 2-x, & x\gt 1\end{cases}$$

$$g(x)=\begin{cases}x^2, & x\leq 1 \\ 6-x, & x\gt 1\end{cases}$$

Function $f$ is continuous, but function $g$ is discontinuous. Correct?

$$\lim_{{x}\to{1^{-}}}f(x)=1$$

$$\lim_{{x}\to{1^{+}}}f(x)=5$$

$$\lim_{{x}\to{1^{-}}}f(x) \neq \lim_{{x}\to{1^{+}}}f(x)$$

$$\lim_{{x}\to{1^{-}}}g(x)=1$$

$$\lim_{{x}\to{1^{+}}}g(x)=1$$

$$\lim_{{x}\to{1^{-}}}g(x) = \lim_{{x}\to{1^{+}}}g(x)$$

So far so good? If we were to examine the limits of a function in this manner for every point, we would be able to tell if it has any jump discontinuities?

Now, do only piece-wise functions have jump discontinuities? Are there any other kind of functions that have "jump" discontinuities?

Does the jump always occur in the vertical direction? As in jumping from $(1,1)$ to $(1,5)$ as opposed to $(1,1)$ to $(2,4)$?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
samir said:
So far so good? If we were to examine the limits of a function in this manner for every point, we would be able to tell if it has any jump discontinuities?

Now, do only piece-wise functions have jump discontinuities? Are there any other kind of functions that have "jump" discontinuities?

Does the jump always occur in the vertical direction? As in jumping from $(1,1)$ to $(1,5)$ as opposed to $(1,1)$ to $(2,4)$?

Hey samir! ;)

So far so good... just that $f$ and $g$ seem to have been mixed up.
And yes, examining the limits of each point of a function will tell us where the jump discontinuities are.

Which functions are you considering?
If we only look at standard continuous functions like $\sin x$, and at functions we compose with nested function calls and additions and such, we can't get jump discontinuities.
However, consider the standard unit step function, written as $H(x)$ or $u(x)$ or $\Theta(x)$, which is also known as the Heaviside step function.
It implicitly has a jump discontinuity.
Of course, to define what we mean with $\Theta(x)$, we'll need a piece-wise function definition. :rolleyes:

Anyway, we can write your $g(x)$ as:
$$g(x) = x^2\Theta(1-x) + (6-x)\Theta(x-1)$$
The actual value of $\Theta(0)$ is a bit ambiguous though, and depends on which text you're reading.
It can be any of $0$, $\frac 12$, or $1$. If you consider it relevant, we should simply define what we mean by $\Theta$ before using it.
(For the record, I picked $\Theta$ as symbol to use, because it's the most exotic. :cool:)

We don't really have a "vertical" jump in a function - a function is supposed to be an abstract thing without geometrical meaning.
However, if we get a pencil and draw a graph of $y=f(x)$ where $y$ is considered to be vertical on the paper, then yes, a jump discontinuity corresponds to an abrupt change in $y$ from one $x$ value to the next - a vertical jump.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top