Discovering the True Speed of Light: A Question on Its Absolute Nature

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the speed of light, particularly its absolute value and how it can be measured given the relative motion of Earth and other celestial bodies. Participants explore concepts related to reference frames and the implications of relativity on measuring the speed of light.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the true value of the speed of light can be known if there is no absolute stationary reference point, given the motion of Earth and other celestial bodies.
  • Another participant suggests that the universe can be viewed as a reference frame, implying that measurements are relative to one's position within it.
  • A different participant asserts that the speed of light is invariant and can be measured from any reference frame, emphasizing that stationary is a relative term.
  • One participant explains that measuring the speed of light from different positions or while in motion will yield the same result, reinforcing the idea of its constancy.
  • Another participant references the theory of relativity, indicating that the locally measured speed of light remains constant regardless of the observer's motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the concept of stationary reference frames and how they relate to measuring the speed of light. There is no consensus on the implications of these ideas, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of defining stationary and reference frames, indicating that these terms depend on relative motion and context. The discussion does not resolve the nuances of these definitions.

thenewsguys
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Just a random question regarding the speed of light. I am not a physics major or a college student, just curious.

I was watching a program on the science channel (I think) and it was talking about how the speed of light is absolute. The example it gave was traveling in a car at a high rate of speed then turning on a flash light facing in the same direction as the car. So if the car was going 100 mph it wouldn't add on to the speed of "C", since it is absolute.

So, my question is since the Earth is moving in our solar system and our sun is moving in our galaxy and our galaxy is moving in space, how can we know the true value of "C" if we don't know what stationary is? Does this make sense? I might be looking at this the wrong way but I figure someone here might know.

Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'm not 100% sure on this but imagine the whole universe as a giant car. Everything in it seems stationary to someone inside the car. Similar to that, the only way to answer your question is to view our universe from another universe.

IDK, just a guess, I might be wrong. xD
 
Statonary is whatever reference frame from which you measure the speed of light. The speed of light is invariant irrespective of the reference frame.
 
thenewsguys said:
how can we know the true value of "C" if we don't know what stationary is?
Terms like stationary can only be applied to objects in reference to other objects. For example the chair I am sitting on is stationary relative to me but not to a car driving by my house.
 
thenewsguys said:
Just a random question regarding the speed of light. I am not a physics major or a college student, just curious.

I was watching a program on the science channel (I think) and it was talking about how the speed of light is absolute. The example it gave was traveling in a car at a high rate of speed then turning on a flash light facing in the same direction as the car. So if the car was going 100 mph it wouldn't add on to the speed of "C", since it is absolute.

So, my question is since the Earth is moving in our solar system and our sun is moving in our galaxy and our galaxy is moving in space, how can we know the true value of "C" if we don't know what stationary is? Does this make sense? I might be looking at this the wrong way but I figure someone here might know.

Thanks.
Hi, welcome to physicsforums. :smile:

It's really a "relativity" question. According to that theory the "locally" measured speed of light is always c, if it is measured with a standard reference system. Indirectly, your question was recently discussed here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=641102

Does that help?
 
thenewsguys said:
... how can we know the true value of "C" if we don't know what stationary is?

You don't need to know what stationary is. Imagine you're standing on the Earth and you measure the speed of light. Shoot a light beam one way, the opposite way, every which way, and you will measure the same speed of light. THEN, accelerate in some direction and while moving, do the same experiment. Shoot the light forward, back, up, down...you'll get the same result. The speed of light is the same.

That's enough to tell you that no matter what you do, the speed of light is the same.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K