Discrepancy between my work and book's [Static Fluid/Pressure]

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeff.berhow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
jeff.berhow
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
The book (Example 13-3):
XmnYGsI.jpg


My attempt:
GgSrM7Q.jpg


My confusion is in why they are starting their height at 1.0 meters above the surface of the water and then getting a y_2 value of 2.0 meters. That's the discrepancy that's giving me a different value than the book's. It never says in the question to do that, and I'm baffled as to how I am supposed to know.

Thanks in advance for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.

In P = ρgh, h denotes the depth below the surface of the water. h is also your integration variable. What is the value of h at the top of the window? At the bottom of the window?

[EDIT: Note that the window is submerged below the surface of the water.]
 
h = 0.0 meters at the top and h = 1.0 meters at the bottom of the window.
 
Ah, I see. I wish they would explicitly state these things in the question as it seems I am unable to derive them from the pictures, haha. Well, they don't write the books for me!

Thanks TSny! I will approach this problem again. Do you think I can keep my origin at the top of the window and change my bounds to -1m to +1m? It seems this will still give me an incorrect value and I may have to change my origin to the top of the water tank.
 
Suppose you introduce a y-axis going vertically downward. You can certainly choose the origin of y to be at the top of the window. Then you would need to think about how to express the depth h in terms of y.

[EDIT: You could then integrate from y = 0 to y = 1.]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Alright, it seems you have nailed the source of confusion on the head. I will have to redraw my diagram and rewrite my integral thinking about the relation of h and y.

edit: I was way overthinking this. I reintegrated with new bounds and it comes out perfectly. Thanks a bunch, TSny!
 
Last edited: