Discrete math - equivalence relation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of equivalence relations in the context of discrete mathematics, specifically examining the relationship between a total function and its properties related to being one-to-one. Participants explore definitions and implications of equivalence classes derived from a function.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant defines a relation R on a set A based on a total function f from A to another set B, stating that R consists of pairs (x,y) such that f(x) = f(y).
  • Another participant provides guidance on using TeX for mathematical notation, specifically for the symbol representing "element of".
  • A participant questions whether others have attempted the problem, suggesting that the solution should follow from the definitions provided.
  • One participant attempts to prove that f is one-to-one if and only if the equivalence classes of R are singleton sets, explaining that if f(x) = f(y) implies x = y, then the equivalence class [x] contains only x.
  • Another participant notes that the thread is misplaced and should be in the set theory section.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion includes various viewpoints and attempts to address the problem, but no consensus is reached regarding the placement of the thread or the completeness of the proof provided.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the definitions of equivalence relations and functions may be implicit, and the discussion does not resolve whether the proof is complete or correct.

tukilala
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Let A be a set. For every set B and total function f:A->B we define a relation R on A by R={(x,y) belonging to A*A:f(x)=f(y)}



*belonging to - because i don't know how to make the symbole...


Prove that f is one-to-one if and only if the equivalence classes of R are all singletones
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can write TeX code by inserting [ tex] ... [\ tex] and putting the code in between (obviously without the spaces). The notation for element of is \in: x \in A.

You can hit quote to see the code behind what I wrote.
 
Have you made any attempt at this problem? It should follow easily from the definitions.
 
OK, here is one attempt.
f is 1-1 iff for every x,y if f(x)=f(y) then x=y.

The relation is defined by ~<=> x~y<=>f(x)=f(y), thus the equivalence class [x]={y|y~x}={y|f(x)=f(y)} if it's one to one it's evident that [x] is a singleton.
 
Btw, it's not in the right place this thread of yours, it should be in the set theory section.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
484
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K