Discrete-Time Waveforms: Properties & Conditions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RaduAndrei
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties and conditions of discrete-time waveforms, specifically focusing on how these waveforms can be expressed as linear combinations of other waveforms. The conversation touches on theoretical aspects related to linear algebra and applications in linear time-invariant (LTI) systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the conditions under which any discrete-time waveform can be expressed as a linear combination of other discrete-time waveforms, specifically mentioning the unit step function as an example.
  • Another participant states that a condition is that the base waveforms must form a complete basis, similar to concepts in linear algebra, although they express confusion regarding the relevance of the unit step function in this context.
  • A third participant elaborates on the use of the unit step function in LTI systems, explaining that knowing the system's response to the unit step function allows for the calculation of outputs for any input function, provided the input can be expressed as a linear combination of unit step functions.
  • It is noted that a necessary condition for the base waveforms is that they must be non-zero, with the unit step function being non-zero for n>=0, but other conditions are also implied.
  • Another participant adds that for the expansion to be unique, the base vectors must be linearly independent and must span the space, indicating that there must be N base vectors if the space has N dimensions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the conditions for expressing discrete-time waveforms as linear combinations. While some conditions are mentioned, there is no consensus on the completeness or clarity of these conditions, and the discussion remains somewhat unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential missing assumptions about the nature of the waveforms and the specific definitions of the conditions discussed. The discussion does not resolve the implications of these conditions on the broader context of discrete-time waveforms.

RaduAndrei
Messages
114
Reaction score
1
I don't know if I write in the right section or not.

I saw that every discrete-time waveform can be written as a linear combination of almost any other discrete-time waveform.

What are the conditions imposed on this other discrete-time waveform?
For example, the unit step function obeys these conditions.

PS: the waveforms are real not complex
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, one of the conditions on this other discrete-time waveform is that any discrete-time waveform can be written as a linear combination of these base waveforms.
In other words that your base waveforms form a complete basis. Just like in linear algebra. There are rules for those bases.

Must say I don't follow your "For example, the unit step function obeys these conditions" ? But I can imagine a time series built up from step functions.
 
The unit step function is used in LTI systems. If you know the response of the LTI system to the unit step function, then you can calculate the output to any input function.
You just write the input function as a sum of unit step functions. Then, by homogeneity,additivity and time invariance you can calculate the output just by knowing the response to the unit step function.

In other words, you must write the discrete-time waveform that you want to apply to the system as a linear combination of unit step functions.

A first condition is obviously that this other discrete waveform must be non-zero. The unit step function, for example, is non-zero for n>=0. But there are other conditions as well.
 
To make the expansion unique, the base vectors must be linearly independent. (That covers your on-zero).
And there must be N of them if the space has N dimensions (they must span the space).
And that's about it, not much more.

But now I'm repeating the statements in the link I gave.
 
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K