Discussing the mathematical formalism of generators (Lorentz Group)

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the mathematical formalism of the Lorentz group, which encompasses rotations and boosts that adhere to the Lorentz condition. Participants explore the representation of this group through matrices, specifically how infinitesimal transformations relate to generators of the group. The Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula is highlighted as a crucial tool for expressing compositions of transformations as exponentials of generators. There is a focus on understanding specific equations related to transformations and the implications of commutation relations between boosts and rotations. Overall, the conversation aims to clarify the mathematical foundations underlying Lorentz transformations and their representations.
  • #31
samalkhaiat said:
Rotations or non-rotations, by the object (M_{\alpha \beta})^{\mu}{}_{\nu}, we always mean the (\mu\nu) matrix elements of the matrix M_{\alpha \beta}.

Alright, so the upper index refers to rows and the lower to columns always. Thanks for the clarification.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
PeroK said:
[...] the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorf formula [...]

I've found a reliable source about the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorf formula: problem 3 here. The solution is here :smile: .
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K