Disproving vs Proving: Certainty of Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter 15123
  • Start date Start date
15123
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Whyis it easier to disprove something than to prove something?

Why can you have more certainty of something being untrue?
Why is it hard to say something is true if the experiment's result yields it being true? Why is it a 'big maybe'?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
15123 said:
Whyis it easier to disprove something than to prove something?

Why can you have more certainty of something being untrue?
Why is it hard to say something is true if the experiment's result yields it being true? Why is it a 'big maybe'?

Are you asking a math question or a science question?

In math finding a counterexample is the easiest way to disprove something.

In science you can never "prove" anything. If the idea leads to many verifiable experiments then it could be an acceptable theory. One experiment may not be enough.
 
It is a statistics question. I followed the example of the 'swan experiment'.
 
15123 said:
It is a statistics question. I followed the example of the 'swan experiment'.
I am not familiar with the swan experiment. Does it have anything to do with black swans?
 
Direction of Entropy

The direction of entropy: it is easier to destroy than create
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top