Dissecting a Physics Answer Dealing with Converting to Mols

  • Thread starter mysticxhobo
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Physics
In summary, the solution involves calculating the difference in mass of the gold ring over 53 years, converting it to moles using the atomic mass of gold, and then dividing by the total number of seconds in 53 years to find the average number of atoms abraded from the ring per second of marriage. The conversion to moles is done by dividing the total mass by the atomic mass, similar to how you would calculate the number of moles of a substance using its molar mass.
  • #1
mysticxhobo
3
0
I'm attempting to understand what is going on in the solution to a problem. Heres the question and the answer:

Question:
On your wedding day your lover gives you a gold ring of mass 3.74 g. 53 years later its mass is 3.21 g. On the average how many atoms were abrated from the ring during each second of your marriage? The atomic mass of gold is 197 u.

Answer:
Step 1: 3.74-3.21 = 0.26 g lost
Step 2: 0.26g /197 g/mol = 0.001319797mols x 6.02214179x1023 atoms/mol = 7.948004393x1020atoms
Step 3: 53yrs x 365days/year x 24hours/day x 60min/hr x 60 sec/min =1671408000 seconds
Step 4: 7.948004393x1020 atoms/1671408000 seconds =4.75527483x1011atoms/second

I understand everything besides step two. You are given 197 as the atomic mass unit in the question. But what do you do with this number so that it can be multiplied by avagadro's number? so basically what operations lead to 0.001319797mols?

thanks,
mysticxhobo
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
okay i figured out what was done. the total grams of the substance was divided by the atomic mass of the substance.

.26 / 197 = .0031.. . . . .

but can someone explain why it was done this way?

thanks
 
  • #3
If molar mass of iron is 56g/mol and you have 56g of iron, obviously you have

[tex]\frac {56 g}{56 \frac{g}{mol}}=1 mol[/tex]

of iron. If you have 28g of iron, you have

[tex]\frac {28 g}{56 \frac{g}{mol}}=\frac 1 2 mol[/tex]

and so on.
 

FAQ: Dissecting a Physics Answer Dealing with Converting to Mols

1. What is the process for converting units to mols in a physics problem?

The process for converting units to mols involves using the molar mass and Avogadro's number. First, determine the molar mass of the substance by looking at the periodic table. Then, multiply the given quantity (in grams or moles) by the molar mass to get the number of moles. Finally, use Avogadro's number (6.022 x 10^23) to convert from moles to particles or vice versa.

2. How is Avogadro's number used in converting to mols?

Avogadro's number is used to convert between the unit of measurement for moles (6.022 x 10^23) and the unit of measurement for particles (atoms, molecules, etc.). This allows for a more accurate representation of the number of substances present in a given quantity.

3. Can I use the molar mass of a compound to convert to mols?

Yes, the molar mass of a compound can be used to convert to mols. The molar mass is the mass of one mole of a substance and is typically measured in grams per mole. By using the molar mass, you can convert between grams and moles of a substance.

4. Is converting to mols necessary in all physics problems?

No, converting to mols is not necessary in all physics problems. It is typically used in chemistry problems involving calculations with substances and their quantities. If a problem does not involve substances or their quantities, converting to mols may not be necessary.

5. What are some common units used in converting to mols?

Common units used in converting to mols include grams, moles, and particles (atoms, molecules, etc.). These units can be converted between using the molar mass and Avogadro's number as mentioned previously. Additionally, liters can also be used when dealing with gases at standard temperature and pressure.

Back
Top