Dissipation of mechàanical energy in collision of sandwiches

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a collision between two sandwiches, focusing on the dissipation of mechanical energy during the event. The problem involves concepts of momentum and kinetic energy in a physics context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of momentum and the non-conservation of kinetic energy in the collision. They explore calculations of initial and final kinetic energy and question the accuracy of their results.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaged in verifying calculations related to kinetic energy before and after the collision. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of kinetic energy changes, and there is an ongoing examination of the calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of homework constraints, as participants are checking their calculations against expected results and addressing errors in their computations.

emeraldempres
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
On a greasy, essentially frictionless lunch counter, a submarine sandwich of mass 0.500 kg, moving with speed 3.50 m/s to the left, collides with a grilled cheese sandwich of mass 0.200 kg moving with speed 2.00 m/s to the right.

How much mechanical energy dissipates in the collision?

I calculated the final velocity (-1.93 m/s) but I don not know where to go after that
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this collision, think about what's being conserved and what isn't.

Momentum is always conserved. That leaves just one thing that isn't.
 
Compare the initial total KE of both sandwiches to the final KE.
 
i think that the kinetic energy is what is not being conserved because it is being transferred to puck b.

the initial ke of a is
a: ke= .5(.5)(-3.5^2)= 3.0625
b: ke= .5 (.2)(2^2)= 1

and the final ke is ke= .5(.5+.2)(-1.93^2)= 1.304

I had all these and subtract them from eacj other and got -2.76
 
Pretty sure that's right, although the negative sign is unnecessary. As long as you understand that your answer is the change in kinetic energy, that is, the kinetic energy of your system went down by that much, you're good.
 
I just tried that one and my homework says that -2.76 and 2.76 are not right. Anything else i can do?
 
emeraldempres said:
the initial ke of a is
a: ke= .5(.5)(-3.5^2)= 3.0625
b: ke= .5 (.2)(2^2)= 1
Redo that second calculation.
 
thanks. i went back through my math and found an error, the answer is -2.16 J
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K