Distance between point charges in equilibrium (simple)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two fixed point charges, +1.07 µC and -3.28 µC, separated by 61.8 cm, and seeks to determine the location of a third charge where no net force acts on it. The context is rooted in electrostatics and Coulomb's law.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the placement of the third charge and question whether positioning it closer to the larger magnitude charge is appropriate. There are attempts to set up equations based on the forces acting on the third charge, leading to concerns about obtaining imaginary distances.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance regarding the placement of the third charge and the conditions for equilibrium. There is an acknowledgment of the need to balance the forces acting on the charge, with ongoing exploration of the implications of charge placement.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of obtaining an imaginary distance in their calculations, suggesting potential errors in their assumptions or setups. There is also a mention of difficulties in formatting mathematical expressions for clarity.

Mitocarta
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two fixed charges, +1.07 uC and -3.28 uC, are 61.8 cm apart. Where may a third charge be located so that no net force acts on it?

Homework Equations



Coulombs law

The Attempt at a Solution



q1 = 1.07 uC
q2 = -3.28 uC
q3 = q

q1 ----- q2 ----- q

q1 and q2 are separated by 0.618 m and q2 and q are separated by x

Since the charges are in equilibrium,


0 = k (1.07E-6)(q) / (0.618+x)^2 + k(1.07E-6)(q) / (x)^2

factoring out and eliminating k and q,

(1.07E-6)/(0.618+x)^2 + (3.28E-6)/(x)^2 = 0

Solving for x gives me an imaginary distance. I feel like this is a very simple problem but I can't spot my error. What am I doing incorrectly? Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Mitocarta, welcome to PF!

You've placed q closer to the larger magnitude charge. Is that going to work?
 
TSny said:
Hello Mitocarta, welcome to PF!

You've placed q closer to the larger magnitude charge. Is that going to work?

Thank you for replying. When I switch the charges,

(3.28E-6)/(0.618+x)^2 + (1.07E-6)/(x)^2 = 0

I still get an imaginary answer.
Edit: Is there a way to input math in an easier to read format on this forum?
 
The two forces act in opposite directions on q. The net force will be zero if the magnitudes of the forces are equal to each other.
 
TSny said:
The two forces act in opposite directions on q. The net force will be zero if the magnitudes of the forces are equal to each other.

Oh I was overlooking that! Thank you so much, got the correct answer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K