Distance between surfaces in an assembly of sliding parts

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the design of sliding metal parts in SolidWorks, specifically focusing on the appropriate distance between surfaces to ensure smooth operation. The user is working with copper components and seeks guidance on standard allowances for fit, emphasizing that a tight fit is impractical. Recommendations include using a table for preferred fits and a calculator for determining deviations based on selected fits, which are essential for achieving optimal functionality in assembly design.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SolidWorks 2023 for CAD modeling
  • Knowledge of metal properties, specifically copper
  • Familiarity with engineering tolerances and fits
  • Ability to use fit tables and calculators for shaft and hole dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "SolidWorks assembly design best practices"
  • Explore "engineering tolerances and fits for metal parts"
  • Learn how to use "fit tables for sliding parts in mechanical design"
  • Investigate "calculators for shaft and hole deviations in engineering"
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mechanical engineers, CAD designers, and anyone involved in the design and assembly of sliding metal components, particularly those using SolidWorks for their projects.

Kavorka
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
I have been working on designing something in SolidWorks for the first time, which involves several parts with surfaces that slide into one another. I am wondering if there is a table or a standardization in terms of the distance that should be left between metal surfaces with sliding parts. I assume this depends on the type of metals and the tightness of the fit (I'm using copper parts, and the pieces should be able to easily slide in/out of one another). Obviously you can't have a metal piece you want to insert into another metal piece with the dimensions of the fit and fitting being exactly the same, it would be a very tight fit. Whether you should make an allowance 0.001 mm or 0.1 mm of space in your dimensions is beyond me though. Any advice?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
17K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
42K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K