Distinguish Leaves vs Leaflets: Objective Criteria

AI Thread Summary
Distinguishing between leaves and leaflets can be approached by examining the structure of the plant. In deciduous plants, a single twig leading to a single leaf indicates it is a leaf, while multiple branches from the attachment point suggest the presence of leaflets. This concept relates to the evolutionary idea of a large leaf being segmented into smaller leaflets. Buds play a crucial role in this identification process; they form at the junction between the leaf and its branch and can develop into branches, leaves, or flowers. Contrary to the belief that buds vanish, they actually grow and transform, remaining visible at the base of branches and stems. Understanding these features is essential for accurately identifying plant structures.
Stephen Tashi
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Messages
7,864
Reaction score
1,602
TL;DR Summary
What are the objective criteria for determining whether something on a plant is a leaf vs whether it is a leaflet?
If I'm informed that a structure on a plant is a leaf with a certain number of leaflets, I can usually visualize the plant that way. But if I'm not informed about that fact, I only see leaves. How can I distinguish leaves vs leaflets?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I'm not an expert on leaves but this is the approach I would take:
on deciduous plants (that loose their leaves seasonally) if there is a single little twig going to a single leaf surface then its a leaf. If there are little branches going from the leaf attachment point to several leaves, they are leaflets.
Its like a big leaf (evolutionarially) broken up in to several smaller leaves.

Screenshot 2023-07-03 at 12.54.09 AM.png
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc and Vanadium 50
The buds seem to be key features in the diagrams. I'm ignorant about what buds are. I think of them as the initial stages of a branch or leaf - something that would turn into a branch or the stem of a leaf and thus vanish. Yet in the diagrams the buds are still present at the base of branches and stems.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
something that would turn into a branch or the stem of a leaf and thus vanish
Buds form in the crotch between the leaf and its branch.
Buds can become branches, leaves, or flowers (buds). They don't vanish, they grow and change.
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc, jim mcnamara, pinball1970 and 1 other person
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top