I Distribution of Sum of Two Weird Random Variables....

Steve Zissou
Messages
75
Reaction score
4
Hi there.

Let's say I have the following relationship:

x = a + b*z + c*y

z is distributed normally
y is distributed according to a different distribution, say exponential

Is there a way to figure out what is the distribution of x?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I will assume that the two random variables are independent.
The constant offset, ##a##, can always be dealt with last. So let's ignore it for now.
Consider the sum of two random variables, ##r_1 = b*z## and ##r_2 = c*y## with distributions ##p_1(r_1)## and ##p_2(r_2)##, respectively.
The distribution, ##p(x)##, of the sum, ##x = r_1+r_2## is the convolution, ##p(x) = \int_{t=-\infty}^{t=\infty}p_1(t)p_2(x-t) \,dt ##
 
  • Like
Likes Steve Zissou
Nice! Thank you very much, FactChecker!
 
For a given value x = X,
What is the probability that z has a value Z?
What is the probability that y has the value Y = (X -a -bZ)/c?
Integrate over z: f(x=X) = ∫f(z=Z)f(Y=(X-a-bZ)/c)dZ
(Assuming z and y are distributed independently. If not, you have to use a conditional probability for Y.)
Note that the range of z and y may be limited to less than their full possible range, e.g. if z is normal, it can take negative values, but if y is exponential it can only be positive (or zero). Therefore Z is limited to values for which X - a - bZ is nonnegative, ie Z ≤ (X - a)/b. (That's if b and c are both positive, work it out for yourself for other cases.)
 
Thanks, mjc123!
 
Thought I would generalize by referring to the topic of Propagation of Error/Uncertainty, who's topic is to determine the (co)variance of functions of Random Variables.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top