Distribution of the sum of three random variables

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the probability density function (pdf) of the random variable U, defined as U=(X+Y+Z)/3, given the joint pdf of three independent random variables X, Y, and Z. The initial approach suggested involves calculating the cumulative distribution function F_U(u) by integrating the joint density over a specified region, followed by differentiation to obtain the pdf. The conversation highlights challenges with convergence in integrals when using transformations or convolutions. A proposed method involves changing variables and adjusting the order of integration to derive the density function directly. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that both cumulative distribution and direct integration methods can be used to find f_U effectively.
TeXfreak
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. I have this problem. Given three random variables X, Y, Z with joint pdf (probability density function)

f(x,y,z)=\exp(-(x+y+z)) if x>0, y>0, z>0; 0 elsewhere

find the pdf of U (f_U), where U is the random variable given by U=(X+Y+Z)/3.

Now I know how to find the joint pdf of a random vector of equal dimension as that of the original vector (via the Jacobian of the inverse transformation, that is, when the transformation is from R^n to R^n, but in this case it is from R^3 to R), or how to find the pdf of the sum of two independent random variables (via the convolution of the two pdfs), but I can't figure out how to do this one.

One could set the transformation to be g : R^3 \to R^3 defined by g(x,y,z)=((x+y+z)/3,y,z) (though I am not sure whether that would be right), so as to find the pdf of g(X,Y,Z) and then find the marginal density function of U, but then the integral does not converge.

And trying convolutions, something like f_U = f_X * (f_Y * f_Z) ---and here I am less sure if it's ok--- the integral doesn't converge either.

Could anybody can help me with this problem, please? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First find the cumulative distribution function, F_U(u) = P((X+Y+Z)/3 < u), by integrating the joint density function f(x,y,z) over the tetrahedron satisfying x > 0, y > 0, z > 0, (x+y+z)/3 < u. Then differentiate F_U to get the density function for U.
 
A general method I often use is as follows. The probability density function fU of a random variable U is defined by the following expression for the expected value of h(U), for any function h

<br /> E[h(U)] = \int f_U(u) h(u)\,du.<br />

Just substitute in U=(X+Y+Z)/3

<br /> \int f_U(u) h(u)\,du=E[h((X+Y+Z)/3)]=\int_0^\infty \int_0^\infty\int_0^\infty f(x,y,z)h((x+y+z)/3) \,dx\,dy\,dz<br />

change variables x = 3u - y - z in the inner integral

<br /> \int f_U(u) h(u)\,du=\int_0^\infty \int_0^\infty\int_{(y+z)/3}^\infty f(3u-y-z,y,z)h(u) 3\,du\,dy\,dz<br />

Change the order of integration

<br /> \int f_U(u) h(u)\,du=\int_0^\infty\int_0^{3u} \int_0^{3u-z} f(3u-y-z,y,z)h(u) 3\,dy\,dz\,du<br />

from which you can read off the density

<br /> f_U(u)=3\int_0^{3u} \int_0^{3u-z} f(3u-y-z,y,z) \,dy\,dz<br />

This is virtually the same as calculating the cumulative distribution (by taking g(u)=1_{\{u&gt;K\}}), but without the differentiation step to convert to the density at the end. So, whichever method you prefer.
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K