Dividing cancels out a solution?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ainster31
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of dividing by a variable in mathematical equations, specifically in the context of the equation \( r^2 = 2r \sin \theta \). Participants explore whether dividing out a variable leads to the loss of solutions, particularly the solution \( r = 0 \), and whether taking the square root of both sides provides a more accurate representation of the solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that dividing by a variable can lead to losing solutions, specifically the solution \( r = 0 \).
  • One participant questions the validity of the expression \( |r| = \sqrt{2r \sin \theta} \), arguing that it does not solve for \( r \) since \( r \) still appears on both sides.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of checking for zero when dividing by a variable, providing an example to illustrate the potential loss of solutions.
  • Some participants propose that rewriting the equation as \( r(r - 2 \sin \theta) = 0 \) clearly shows the solutions without losing any.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that dividing by a variable can lead to the loss of solutions, particularly \( r = 0 \). However, there is disagreement on whether taking the square root of both sides is a more correct approach, with some arguing it does not provide a solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the implications of dividing by a variable and the conditions under which solutions may be lost. There are also unresolved discussions about the necessity and correctness of taking square roots in this context.

ainster31
Messages
158
Reaction score
1
Context:

In the video, he divides out a variable as below:
$$r^2=2rsin\theta\\r=2sin\theta$$
When you do a division like this, aren't you dividing out a variable?

What happens if you take the square root of both sides like below?
$$r^2=2rsin\theta\\|r|=\sqrt{2rsin\theta}$$
Would that be more correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, he is. I particular, he has "lost" the r= 0 for all [itex]\theta[/itex] solution.

I'm not sure what you mean by "more correct" for [itex]|r|= \sqrt{2r sin(\theta)}[/itex]. It is not at all a "solution" because you have not "solved for r".
 
ainster31 said:
Context:

In the video, he divides out a variable as below:
$$r^2=2rsin\theta\\r=2sin\theta$$
When you do a division like this, aren't you dividing out a variable?
Well, of course. The more important point is that you are potentially losing a solution of the equation; namely, r = 0. In this case, it doesn't matter because the equation r = 2sin(θ) still has r = 0 when θ = 0 + k##\pi##.
ainster31 said:
What happens if you take the square root of both sides like below?
$$r^2=2rsin\theta\\|r|=\sqrt{2rsin\theta}$$
Would that be more correct?
No, and besides, what's the point? You haven't solved for r since it still appears on both sides of the equation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How did you know he cancels out the ##r=0## solution?
 
ainster31 said:
How did you know he cancels out the ##r=0## solution?

Because that's the solution that always disappears when you divide by a variable. The only root of ##rA(...) = rB(...)## with ##A\neq{B}## is ##r=0##, and that's the one that we're losing when we divide both sides by ##r## to turn the equation into ##A(...) = B(...)##.
 
ainster31 said:
How did you know he cancels out the ##r=0## solution?

Any time you divide both sides of an expression by something, you should check to see whether that thing can be zero. If it can be, then you have lost solutions corresponding to when that equals zero. For example, if someone asks you to solve:

(x-1)(x-2) = (x-1)(2x-1)

The first thing we do is divide both sides by x-1
(x-2) = (2x-1)

Now we solve for x
x = -1

OK, but we divided both sides by x-1, and we have to be worried about when that is equal to zero. x-1= 0 when x=1, so I should go back to the original equation and check that x=1 is a solution, which it is easily seen to be.
 
ainster31 said:
Context:

In the video, he divides out a variable as below:
$$r^2=2rsin\theta\\r=2sin\theta$$
When you do a division like this, aren't you dividing out a variable?

What happens if you take the square root of both sides like below?
$$r^2=2rsin\theta\\|r|=\sqrt{2rsin\theta}$$
Would that be more correct?


Simply do:

r^2=2rsin\theta\ <-> r(r-2sin\theta\)=0 <-> r = 0 or r = 2sin\theta\


problem solved !

(sorry I don't know how to do the maths letters here )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
230K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K