MHB Divisors of Zero in Rings: A[x] and the Impossibility in Polynomial Rings

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kiwi1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Zero
Click For Summary
In polynomial rings A[x], where A is a commutative ring with unity, it is impossible for every non-zero element to be a divisor of zero. This is because if a polynomial ax + 1 were a divisor of zero, it would lead to a contradiction where all coefficients of the corresponding polynomial must equal zero, implying the polynomial itself is zero. The discussion highlights that the structure of A[x] relies on A being a commutative ring, and thus the properties of divisors of zero cannot hold as they might in non-commutative or trivial rings. The example of P_3 illustrates that while certain rings can exhibit unusual properties, polynomial rings maintain stricter rules. Ultimately, the impossibility of having every element as a divisor of zero in A[x] is rooted in the fundamental definitions of polynomial rings.
Kiwi1
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
There are rings such as P_3 in which every element not equal to 0 or 1 is a divisor of zero. Explain why this is not possible in any ring of polynomials A[x], even when A is not an integral domain.

I can't see how to answer this.

If I define A as Z_3 with the usual addition and define multiplication trivially as a*b=0 then I have A[x] where every element is a divisor of zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Kiwi,

By choosing the trivial action for $\Bbb Z_3$, you would have $1 = 0$ and so $\Bbb Z_3[x]$ would be trivial. You're supposed to have $1\neq 0$.
 
Thanks Euge, I still can't see a solution.

The question does not expressly forbid 1=0 in fact see their example P_3, an 8 element ring where 1=0=empty set.

P_3 also has the interesting property that if p is in P_3 then p^2=0.

Actually p_ip_j=0 iff i=j.

so if a(x)b(x)=0 with a(x)=p_ix+p_j and b(x)=b_nx^n+...+b_0

the constant term must be 0 so b_o=p_j

The term in x must be zero so p_ib_0+b_0b_1=0

I'm lost.
 
Sorry if I wasn't clear. If $A$ is the trivial ring (so $A[x]$) is trivial, then the statement "every element not equal to $0$ or $1$ is a divisor of zero" is vacuously true for $A[x]$.

To form a polynomial ring $A[x]$, you assume $A$ is commutative. Otherwise, you don't have enough information to make $A[x]$ into a ring. You would need an endomorphism $\sigma : A\to A$ and define a multiplication $xa := \sigma(a)x$ (for $a\in A$) to make $A[x]$ into a ring for noncommutative $A$.

Check back to see precisely what they mean by "all rings", as some may consider all rings to be commutative with identity.
 
Thanks, I think I have it.

The introductory paragraphs of my text define a polynomial:

"Let A be a commutative ring with unity, and x an arbitrary symbol ..."

So if A is any such ring and in that ring a,b not zero such that ab=0. Then I can prove that ax+1 is not a divisor of zero.

Assume that ax +1 is a divisor of zero with 'partner' of the form b(x) where:

b(x)=b_nx^n+ ... + b_0

Then

(ax+1)(b_nx^n+ ... + b_0)=0, so b_0=0, and:

(ax+1)(b_nx^{n-1}+ ... + b_1)x=0, so b_1=0

continuting as required we eventually get to:

(ax+1)(b_n)x^n=0, so b_n=0

That is b(x)=0 and ax+1 is not a divisor of zero.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
783
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K