Do gravitons have frequency, like photons?

In summary, the conversation discusses the potential detection of high frequency gravitons and the challenges involved. Gravitons, like photons, have frequency and can be detected through absorption. However, due to the weak gravitational interaction, the probability of absorption is very small. Gravitons also have different selection rules and sensitivities compared to photons. While they can excite the retina, they would not be focused due to their weak absorption and refraction. Additionally, the expected phenomenology of gravitational waves would not differ significantly whether they are considered classical waves or point particles with wave-like behavior.
  • #1
cuallito
95
1
Something I've been thinking about lately. If so, how'd we detect high frequency gravitons? I have Bachelors in physics so you may get a little technical ;)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Gravitons have frequency just like photons, and in principle they could be detected by methods similar to that of photons, by graviton absorption. However, the gravitational interaction is many orders of magnitude weaker than the electromagnetic interaction, so the probability of absorption is very small. That's why, in practice, it is very hard to detect gravitons.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
  • #3
Yes, gravitons have frequency.
They also have different selection rules for absorption (spin 2, not 1) and different sensitivities, because they interact with masses not charges.
Notably, the electronic excitations are much less sensitive to gravitons compared to the nuclear vibrations that are in infrared range. But not completely insensitive, because electrons have nonzero mass.
Gravitons in visual frequency range should duly excite retina, unless barred by selection rules. However, since they are otherwise weakly absorbed and refracted, they would not be focused - they would produce a diffuse glow no matter whether they pass through pupils, closed eyelids or skull.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and Demystifier
  • #4
I would note that in this context, there is not a material difference between the expected phenomenology if gravitational waves are classical waves (as in general relativity), or are instead point particles that exhibit wave-like behavior similar to that of photons (as in a hypothetical quantum gravity theory). In both cases, the frequency can vary.
 

1. Do gravitons have a specific frequency?

According to current theories, gravitons do not have a specific frequency like photons do. Gravitons are described as being massless particles that carry the force of gravity, and therefore their behavior is not dependent on frequency.

2. Can gravitons be detected or measured like photons?

Gravitons have not yet been directly detected or measured due to their extremely small size and weak interaction with matter. However, scientists are working on experiments to indirectly detect their presence and study their properties.

3. Do gravitons travel at the speed of light?

Gravitons are thought to travel at the speed of light, just like photons. This is based on the theory of general relativity, which states that the speed of light is the maximum speed at which any form of matter or energy can travel.

4. Are gravitons a form of electromagnetic radiation like photons?

No, gravitons are not a form of electromagnetic radiation. They are a type of fundamental particle that interacts with matter through the force of gravity.

5. How do gravitons differ from photons?

Gravitons and photons are fundamentally different particles. Gravitons are believed to be responsible for the force of gravity, while photons are responsible for the electromagnetic force. Additionally, gravitons are thought to be massless, while photons have a small amount of mass. They also have different behaviors and properties, such as spin and interaction with matter.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
706
Replies
0
Views
191
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
764
Back
Top