Do I go Physics, Chemistry, or Engineering?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a participant's contemplation of a career change into fields related to physics, chemistry, or engineering, with a focus on environmental applications such as renewable energy sources. The inquiry seeks guidance on where to start given their background and interests.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to understand how things work to help the environment, particularly in renewable energy, but feels inadequate in practical skills like tinkering.
  • Another participant suggests pursuing a four-year degree in engineering or science, or attending a technical school for technician training, emphasizing that imagination can lead to practical skills.
  • A different viewpoint highlights that physics provides fundamental knowledge about nature and energy as a mathematical concept, while chemistry focuses on matter and reactions, particularly in relation to pollution and combustion.
  • Another participant advocates for engineering as the best route, noting its connection to both physics and chemistry, and suggests considering materials science as an additional area of interest.
  • One participant questions the original poster's proficiency in mathematics, implying its importance in these fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the best path forward, with some advocating for engineering while others emphasize the importance of physics or chemistry. No consensus is reached regarding which field is most suitable for the original poster.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the interrelation of the three fields but do not resolve the implications of practical skills versus theoretical understanding in choosing a career path.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering a career change into STEM fields, particularly those interested in environmental science and renewable energy, may find this discussion relevant.

danielandpenn
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Do I go Physics, Chemistry, or Engineering?

Boy, do I need some insight if any are willing and serious. I'm a 34 y.o. married nurse(assoc degree), wife, and mom who has been seriously considering a career change for the past year. I want to figure out how things work to help our environment. I love learning about solar, wind, hydropower energy, geothermal energy. I'm not, however, good at tinkering and building things. I live near the steel mills where a lot of coal-burning takes place. Where do I start? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You can get a 4-year degree in engineering or science or try a technical school where you can train to be a technician.

Not good at tinkering? If you can imagine it you can do it.
 


danielandpenn said:
Boy, do I need some insight if any are willing and serious. I'm a 34 y.o. married nurse(assoc degree), wife, and mom who has been seriously considering a career change for the past year. I want to figure out how things work to help our environment. I love learning about solar, wind, hydropower energy, geothermal energy. I'm not, however, good at tinkering and building things. I live near the steel mills where a lot of coal-burning takes place. Where do I start? Thanks!

That right there says I love engineering but I might not be good at it.

Physics will teach you the fundamentals of nature. That is, you will really understand that energy is merely a mathematical concept we devised to understand motion. This, and other fundamental facts, will be derived and discussed.

The other two are more "applied sciences". That is, they apply physical laws to understand different things. Chemistry is the study of matter and how it reacts. It is a very broad science that deals with things like plastics, materials, and medicine. Chemistry won't deal with different kinds of energy used in power plants per se, but you will get a detailed treatment of coal-burning (and other combustion reactions) as well as pollution.

Engineering will probably discuss these things in depth, as they are the ones building our plants. They will only gloss over the theory, but you will have enough knowledge to understand how these plants function.
 


danielandpenn said:
Boy, do I need some insight if any are willing and serious. I'm a 34 y.o. married nurse(assoc degree), wife, and mom who has been seriously considering a career change for the past year. I want to figure out how things work to help our environment. I love learning about solar, wind, hydropower energy, geothermal energy. I'm not, however, good at tinkering and building things. I live near the steel mills where a lot of coal-burning takes place. Where do I start? Thanks!


Yes, I would definitely go with engineering. These 3 subjects, of course, are all related. But if you go the engineering route, you will definitely encounter general physics and general chemistry.


You might consider also: MATERIALS SCIENCE. This is yet another branch of the science tree; and I think a very cool subject.
 


danielandpenn said:
Boy, do I need some insight if any are willing and serious. I'm a 34 y.o. married nurse(assoc degree), wife, and mom who has been seriously considering a career change for the past year. I want to figure out how things work to help our environment. I love learning about solar, wind, hydropower energy, geothermal energy. I'm not, however, good at tinkering and building things. I live near the steel mills where a lot of coal-burning takes place. Where do I start? Thanks!

Are you math proficient?
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K