Do I need to fall in love of everything?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alivedude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fall Love
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the feelings of a graduate student in engineering physics regarding their lack of enjoyment in certain areas of their education, particularly classical mechanics, while expressing a strong preference for theoretical aspects of physics. The scope includes personal experiences in education and reflections on the necessity of enjoying all areas of physics to be successful in the field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • A graduate student expresses a lack of enjoyment in classical mechanics despite being proficient in theoretical physics and abstract mathematics.
  • Some participants suggest that disliking certain areas of physics may stem from external factors, such as teaching quality or textbook effectiveness.
  • There is a viewpoint that it is important not to dismiss less enjoyable subjects, as they may provide foundational knowledge useful in areas of interest.
  • One participant shares a personal experience of struggling with classical thermodynamics but later teaching it, highlighting the potential for growth in less favored subjects.
  • Another participant echoes the sentiment of finding classical mechanics boring despite understanding its theoretical aspects, indicating a preference for theoretical physics over practical problem-solving.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that it is common to find certain areas of physics less enjoyable, but there is no consensus on whether one needs to enjoy all aspects to be a good physicist. Multiple views on the importance of engaging with less favored subjects remain present.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the influence of teaching methods and personal interests on their engagement with different physics topics, but do not resolve the implications of these factors on overall success in the field.

alivedude
Messages
58
Reaction score
5
I'm a second year grad student within engineering physics and after this I am going to take a master in theoretical physics. My plan is to go even further with a PhD when I am done.

The thing is, I really don't enjoy some parts of my education. I love the theoretical part of almost everything, I am really good at very abstract math and physics but I feel that classical mechanics is one of the most boring things I have ever done. The theory and derivation of it is fine but when it comes to the problem solving it feels like the only thing I am doing is reading some 400 years old methods and repeating it.

So my question is, do you need to like the whole "package" to be a good physicist or is it normal to feel like this about some areas in the field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There can be many reasons why you don't like some parts of physics. Sometimes it can have nothing to do with you, like a bad teacher or a bad textbook, but here can be things which you just don't care about. The important thing is not to dismiss these areas. Do your best in these classes, as you never when something you found boring will be highly important to really understand something you care about, or whether some methods learned for x will be useful to solve y.

Simply bear with the material you don't love, and one day you might be done with it and concentrate on what you do love (until you're asked to teach that boring subject :wink:).
 
DrClaude said:
Simply bear with the material you don't love, and one day you might be done with it and concentrate on what you do love (until you're asked to teach that boring subject :wink:)

I had trouble getting "into" classical thermodynamics. I got a B- in my graduate course on it and had to repeat it. Then I ended up having to teach an undergraduate thermo course for several years! :eek:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude
Haha you are so right! The thing is, I am really good at things like classical mechanics but I still find it so boring. I like the theory and I the fact that I understand how rigid bodys move and how I can use Hamilton and Lagranges equations for systems but when I see those problem sets with bike wheels and homogenous bars and all kinds of stuff like that I just want to put all the books aside, I guess that's why I'm more into theoretical physics than normal engineering :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K